Qayyum Aliya, Goh Jeffrey S, Kakar Sanjay, Yeh Benjamin M, Merriman Raphael B, Coakley Fergus V
Department of Radiology, University of California San Francisco, CA 94143-0628, USA.
Radiology. 2005 Nov;237(2):507-11. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2372040539.
To retrospectively determine the relative accuracy of liver fat quantification with out-of-phase gradient-echo magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and fat-saturated fast spin-echo MR imaging in patients with and without cirrhosis, with histologic analysis as the reference standard.
Committee on Human Research approval was obtained. Patient consent was not required. Data collection ended before HIPAA regulations were implemented, but patient anonymity was maintained. Twenty-seven patients, 16 with cirrhosis, were retrospectively identified who underwent MR imaging before histopathologic evaluation of liver fat at biopsy or surgery. The patient population consisted of 15 male and 12 female patients (mean age, 55 years; range, 16-75 years). One radiologist blinded to the histopathologic results recorded mean signal intensity derived from three regions of interest placed in the right and left lobes of the liver on three sections and signal intensity of the spleen from one region of interest within the same section. Liver fat was quantified with the relative loss of signal intensity on out-of-phase images compared with that on in-phase T1-weighted gradient-echo images and with relative loss of signal intensity on T2-weighted fast spin-echo MR images obtained with fat saturation compared with those obtained without fat saturation. Hotelling t test was used to compare correlation coefficients between relative signal intensity differences and histopathologically determined percentage of fat.
In patients without cirrhosis, liver fat quantification with fat-saturated fast spin-echo MR imaging was significantly better than it was with out-of-phase gradient-echo MR imaging (r = 0.92 vs 0.69, P < .01). In patients with cirrhosis, liver fat quantification was correlated only with fat-saturated fast spin-echo MR imaging (r = 0.76, P < .01); the relative signal intensity loss on out-of-phase gradient-echo MR images was not correlated with histopathologically determined percentage of fat (r = 0.25, P = .36).
Preliminary results suggest liver fat may be more accurately quantified with fat-saturated fast spin-echo MR imaging than with out-of-phase gradient-echo MR imaging, especially in patients with cirrhosis.
以组织学分析作为参考标准,回顾性地确定同相位梯度回波磁共振(MR)成像和脂肪饱和快速自旋回波MR成像对有或无肝硬化患者肝脏脂肪定量的相对准确性。
获得了人类研究委员会的批准。无需患者同意。数据收集在《健康保险流通与责任法案》(HIPAA)法规实施之前结束,但患者匿名性得到了维护。回顾性确定了27例患者,其中16例有肝硬化,这些患者在活检或手术时对肝脏脂肪进行组织病理学评估之前接受了MR成像。患者群体包括15名男性和12名女性患者(平均年龄55岁;范围16 - 75岁)。一名对组织病理学结果不知情的放射科医生记录了在三个层面上放置于肝脏左右叶的三个感兴趣区域得出的平均信号强度,以及同一层面内一个感兴趣区域的脾脏信号强度。通过将同相位T1加权梯度回波图像上的信号强度与反相位图像上的信号强度相对损失进行比较,以及将脂肪饱和的T2加权快速自旋回波MR图像上的信号强度与未进行脂肪饱和的图像上的信号强度相对损失进行比较,来对肝脏脂肪进行定量。采用Hotelling t检验比较相对信号强度差异与组织病理学确定的脂肪百分比之间的相关系数。
在无肝硬化的患者中,脂肪饱和快速自旋回波MR成像对肝脏脂肪的定量明显优于同相位梯度回波MR成像(r = 0.92对0.69,P <.01)。在有肝硬化的患者中,肝脏脂肪定量仅与脂肪饱和快速自旋回波MR成像相关(r = 0.76,P <.01);同相位梯度回波MR图像上的相对信号强度损失与组织病理学确定的脂肪百分比不相关(r = 0.25,P =.36)。
初步结果表明,脂肪饱和快速自旋回波MR成像对肝脏脂肪的定量可能比同相位梯度回波MR成像更准确,尤其是在肝硬化患者中。