Arvanitoyannis Ioannis S, Palaiokostas Christos, Panagiotaki Panagiota
University of Thessaly, School of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Agriculture, Icthyology and Aquatic Environment, Fytokou Street, Nea Ionia Magnesias, 38446 Volos, Hellas, Greece.
Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2009 Feb;49(2):176-201. doi: 10.1080/10408390701856058.
ISO 22000 is the new standard bound to replace HACCP on issues related to food safety. Although several companies, especially the big ones, have either implemented or are on the point of implementing ISO 22000, there are many others which are rather timid and/or reluctant to implement it. The main reason behind that is the lack of information and the fear that the new standard is too demanding in terms of bureaucratic work. This paper aims at making a comparative presentation of how the two systems can be applied to a small smoked salmon producing company thereby facilitating the emergence of the differences. The main difference is that in ISO 22000 systems like Good Manufacturing Practice and Good Hygiene Practice are prerequisites thus leading to lower number of CCPs. In this case study for example, the number of CCPs dropped from eight (8) in HACCP to four (4) in ISO 22000. Furthermore, the Failure Mode and Effect Analysis was applied to the smoked trout manufacturing process in an attempt to calculate quantitatively the Risk Priority Number (RPN) and to find out whether it can be effectively correlated to ISO 22000 and/or HACCP. RPN was found to be higher than 130 for eight steps, in close agreement with HACCP, thereby indicating that corrective actions will have to be undertaken.
ISO 22000是一项旨在取代HACCP中食品安全相关问题的新标准。尽管一些公司,尤其是大型公司,已经实施或即将实施ISO 22000,但仍有许多公司对此持谨慎态度,且/或不愿实施。其背后的主要原因是缺乏信息,以及担心新标准在官僚工作方面要求过高。本文旨在对这两种体系如何应用于一家小型烟熏三文鱼生产公司进行比较,从而凸显两者的差异。主要区别在于,在ISO 22000体系中,良好生产规范和良好卫生规范等是前提条件,因此关键控制点的数量较少。例如,在本案例研究中,关键控制点的数量从HACCP中的八个(8)降至ISO 22000中的四个(4)。此外,失效模式与效应分析应用于烟熏鳟鱼制造过程,试图定量计算风险优先数(RPN),并找出它是否能与ISO 22000和/或HACCP有效关联。结果发现,八个步骤的RPN高于130,这与HACCP的结果非常吻合,表明必须采取纠正措施。