Suppr超能文献

DNA修复基因遗传多态性与DNA修复能力之间的基因型-表型关系。

Genotype-phenotype relationship between DNA repair gene genetic polymorphisms and DNA repair capacity.

作者信息

Shin Aesun, Lee Kyoung-Mu, Ahn Byungchan, Park Chung-Gyu, Noh Sue-Kyung, Park Dong-Young, Ahn Sei-Hyun, Yoo Keun-Young, Kang Daehee

机构信息

Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Control Research Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, Korea.

出版信息

Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2008 Jul-Sep;9(3):501-5.

Abstract

Genotype-phenotype relationships between genetic polymorphisms of DNA repair genes and DNA repair capacity were evaluated in a case-control study of breast cancer. Selected DNA repair genes included were those involved in double-strand break repair (ATM, XRCC2, XRCC4, XRCC6, LIG4, RAD51, RAD52), base excision repair (LIG1), nucleotide excision repair (ERCC1), and mismatch repair (hMLH1). The subjects consisted of histologically confirmed breast cancer cases (n=132) and controls (n=75) with no present or previous history of cancer. Seventeen single nucleotide polymorphisms of 10 genes (ATM -5144A>T, IVS21+1049T>C, IVS33-55T>C, IVS34+60G>A, and 3393T>G, XRCC2 31479G/A, XRCC4 921G/T, XRCC6 1796G/T, LIG4 1977T/C, RAD51 135G/C, 172G/T, RAD52 2259C/T, LIG1 583A/C, ERCC1 8092A/C, 354C/T, hMLH1 5' region -93G/A, 655A/G) were determined by TaqMan assay (ATM) or MALDI-TOF (all other genes). DNA repair capacity was measured by a host cell reactivation assay of repair of ultraviolet damage. The DNA repair capacity (%) did not differ between cases (median 37.2, interquartile range: 23.6-59.6) and controls (median 32.7, interquartile range: 26.7-53.2). However, DNA repair capacity significantly differed by the genotypes of ATM and RAD51 genes among cancer-free controls. Our findings suggest that DNA repair capacity might be influenced by genetic polymorphisms of DNA damage response genes and DNA repair genes.

摘要

在一项乳腺癌病例对照研究中,评估了DNA修复基因的遗传多态性与DNA修复能力之间的基因型-表型关系。所选的DNA修复基因包括参与双链断裂修复的基因(ATM、XRCC2、XRCC4、XRCC6、LIG4、RAD51、RAD52)、碱基切除修复基因(LIG1)、核苷酸切除修复基因(ERCC1)和错配修复基因(hMLH1)。研究对象包括经组织学确诊的乳腺癌病例(n = 132)和无癌症病史的对照(n = 75)。通过TaqMan分析(ATM)或基质辅助激光解吸电离飞行时间质谱法(MALDI-TOF,用于所有其他基因)确定了10个基因的17个单核苷酸多态性(ATM -5144A>T、IVS21+1049T>C、IVS33-55T>C、IVS34+60G>A和3393T>G,XRCC2 31479G/A,XRCC4 921G/T,XRCC6 1796G/T,LIG4 1977T/C,RAD51 135G/C、172G/T,RAD52 2259C/T,LIG1 583A/C,ERCC1 8092A/C、354C/T,hMLH1 5'区域-93G/A、655A/G)。通过宿主细胞对紫外线损伤修复的再激活试验来测量DNA修复能力。病例组(中位数37.2,四分位间距:23.6 - 59.6)和对照组(中位数32.7,四分位间距:26.7 - 53.2)的DNA修复能力(%)没有差异。然而,在无癌对照组中,DNA修复能力因ATM和RAD51基因的基因型而有显著差异。我们的研究结果表明,DNA修复能力可能受DNA损伤反应基因和DNA修复基因的遗传多态性影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验