Suppr超能文献

在接受精神分析治疗的患者中识别临床病例。

Identifying clinical cases among patients assigned to psychoanalytic treatment.

作者信息

Berghout Caspar C, Zevalkink Jolien

机构信息

Netherlands Psychoanalytic Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Bull Menninger Clin. 2008 Summer;72(3):163-78. doi: 10.1521/bumc.2008.72.3.163.

Abstract

The present study compared 89 patients assigned to long-term psychoanalytic psychotherapy or psychoanalysis in the Netherlands with psychiatric and nonclinical norm groups with regard to symptoms and personality pathology as assessed with six instruments. Patients filled in four self-report questionnaires (Symptom Checklist-90-Revised [SCL-90-R], Beck Depression Inventory-II [BDI-II], State-Trait Anxiety Inventory [STAI]) and underwent a personality assessment (Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 [MMPI-2], Rorschach-CS). The authors used statistically defined cutoff values for each measure. For each instrument separately, about 50% of the patients reported clinical levels of psychopathology, some patients being more depressed and others reporting other symptoms. By combining the test scores of the different instruments, the authors found that 91% of the patients were identified as clinical cases. Compared to psychiatric norm groups, these patients appeared to report lower levels of symptom distress, but similar levels of personality pathology. The next step will be to investigate the level of improvement after long-term psychoanalytic treatment.

摘要

本研究将荷兰89名接受长期精神分析心理治疗或精神分析的患者,与使用六种工具评估的精神病学规范组和非临床规范组在症状和人格病理学方面进行了比较。患者填写了四份自我报告问卷(症状自评量表-90修订版[SCL-90-R]、贝克抑郁量表-II[BDI-II]、状态-特质焦虑量表[STAI])并接受了人格评估(明尼苏达多相人格调查表-2[MMPI-2]、罗夏测验-CS)。作者为每项测量使用了统计学定义的临界值。对于每种工具单独而言,约50%的患者报告了精神病理学的临床水平,一些患者更抑郁,另一些患者报告了其他症状。通过综合不同工具的测试分数,作者发现91%的患者被确定为临床病例。与精神病学规范组相比,这些患者似乎报告的症状困扰水平较低,但人格病理学水平相似。下一步将是调查长期精神分析治疗后的改善水平。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验