Knekt P, Lindfors O, Härkänen T, Välikoski M, Virtala E, Laaksonen M A, Marttunen M, Kaipainen M, Renlund C
Social Insurance Institution, Helsinki, Finland.
Psychol Med. 2008 May;38(5):689-703. doi: 10.1017/S003329170700164X. Epub 2007 Nov 16.
Insufficient evidence exists for a viable choice between long- and short-term psychotherapies in the treatment of psychiatric disorders. The present trial compares the effectiveness of one long-term therapy and two short-term therapies in the treatment of mood and anxiety disorders.
In the Helsinki Psychotherapy Study, 326 out-patients with mood (84.7%) or anxiety disorder (43.6%) were randomly assigned to three treatment groups (long-term psychodynamic psychotherapy, short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy, and solution-focused therapy) and were followed up for 3 years from start of treatment. Primary outcome measures were depressive symptoms measured by self-report Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and observer-rated Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD), and anxiety symptoms measured by self-report Symptom Check List Anxiety Scale (SCL-90-Anx) and observer-rated Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA).
A statistically significant reduction of symptoms was noted for BDI (51%), HAMD (36%), SCL-90-Anx (41%) and HAMA (38%) during the 3-year follow-up. Short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy was more effective than long-term psychodynamic psychotherapy during the first year, showing 15-27% lower scores for the four outcome measures. During the second year of follow-up no significant differences were found between the short-term and long-term therapies, and after 3 years of follow-up long-term psychodynamic psychotherapy was more effective with 14-37% lower scores for the outcome variables. No statistically significant differences were found in the effectiveness of the short-term therapies.
Short-term therapies produce benefits more quickly than long-term psychodynamic psychotherapy but in the long run long-term psychodynamic psychotherapy is superior to short-term therapies. However, more research is needed to determine which patients should be given long-term psychotherapy for the treatment of mood or anxiety disorders.
在精神疾病治疗中,长期和短期心理治疗之间缺乏足够证据来做出可行的选择。本试验比较了一种长期治疗和两种短期治疗对情绪和焦虑障碍的治疗效果。
在赫尔辛基心理治疗研究中,326名患有情绪障碍(84.7%)或焦虑障碍(43.6%)的门诊患者被随机分配到三个治疗组(长期精神动力心理治疗、短期精神动力心理治疗和聚焦解决疗法),并从治疗开始起随访3年。主要结局指标包括通过自我报告的贝克抑郁量表(BDI)和观察者评定的汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)测量的抑郁症状,以及通过自我报告的症状自评量表焦虑分量表(SCL - 90 - Anx)和观察者评定的汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAMA)测量的焦虑症状。
在3年随访期间,BDI(51%)、HAMD(36%)、SCL - 90 - Anx(41%)和HAMA(38%)的症状有统计学意义的减轻。在第一年,短期精神动力心理治疗比长期精神动力心理治疗更有效,四项结局指标得分低15 - 27%。在随访的第二年,短期和长期治疗之间未发现显著差异,随访3年后,长期精神动力心理治疗更有效,结局变量得分低14 - 37%。短期治疗的效果未发现统计学显著差异。
短期治疗比长期精神动力心理治疗更快产生疗效,但从长远来看,长期精神动力心理治疗优于短期治疗。然而,需要更多研究来确定哪些患者应接受长期心理治疗以治疗情绪或焦虑障碍。