Suppr超能文献

一项试点II期前瞻性研究,旨在测试阴茎延长装置治疗“阴茎短小”的“疗效”和耐受性。

A pilot phase-II prospective study to test the 'efficacy' and tolerability of a penile-extender device in the treatment of 'short penis'.

作者信息

Gontero Paolo, Di Marco Massimiliano, Giubilei Gianluca, Bartoletti Riccardo, Pappagallo Giovanni, Tizzani Alessandro, Mondaini Nicola

机构信息

Dipartimento di Discipline Medico Chirurgiche, Urologia 1, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.

出版信息

BJU Int. 2009 Mar;103(6):793-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.08083.x. Epub 2008 Oct 16.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess a commonly marketed brand of penile extender, the Andro-Penis(R) (Andromedical, Madrid, Spain), widely used devices which aim to increase penile size, in a phase II single-arm study powered to detect significant changes in penile size, as despite their widespread use, there is little scientific evidence to support their potential clinical utility in the treatment of patients with inadequate penile dimensions.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifteen patients were required to test the efficacy of the device, assuming an effect size of >0.8. Eligible patients were counselled how to use the penile extender for at least 4 h/day for 6 months. Penile dimensions were measured at baseline and after 1, 3, 6 and 12 months (end of study). The erectile function (EF) domain of the International Index of EF was administered at baseline and at the end of the study. Treatment satisfaction was assessed using an institutional unvalidated five-item questionnaire.

RESULTS

After 6 months the mean gain in length was significant, meeting the goals of the effect size, at 2.3 and 1.7 cm for the flaccid and stretched penis, respectively. No significant changes in penile girth were detected. The EF domain scores improved significantly at the end of study. Treatment satisfaction scores were consistent with acceptable to good improvement in all items, except for penile girth, where the score was either 'no change' or 'mild improvement'.

CONCLUSIONS

Penile extenders should be regarded as a minimally invasive and effective treatment option to elongate the penile shaft in patients seeking treatment for a short penis.

摘要

目的

在一项旨在检测阴茎尺寸显著变化的II期单臂研究中,评估一种常见的市售阴茎延长器——Andro-Penis®(西班牙马德里安德罗医学公司),这种设备被广泛使用,旨在增大阴茎尺寸,尽管其使用广泛,但几乎没有科学证据支持其在治疗阴茎尺寸不足患者方面的潜在临床效用。

患者与方法

假定效应量>0.8,需要15名患者来测试该设备的疗效。对符合条件的患者进行指导,告知他们如何使用阴茎延长器,每天至少使用4小时,持续6个月。在基线以及1、3、6和12个月(研究结束时)测量阴茎尺寸。在基线和研究结束时使用国际勃起功能指数的勃起功能(EF)领域进行评估。使用一份机构未经验证的五项问卷评估治疗满意度。

结果

6个月后,阴茎疲软和拉伸状态下的长度平均增加显著,分别为2.3厘米和1.7厘米,达到了效应量目标。未检测到阴茎周长有显著变化。研究结束时,EF领域得分显著改善。治疗满意度得分在所有项目中均显示出从可接受到良好的改善,除了阴茎周长项目,该项目的得分要么是“无变化”,要么是“轻度改善”。

结论

对于寻求治疗阴茎短小的患者,阴茎延长器应被视为一种微创且有效的治疗选择,可延长阴茎体。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验