de Lozar Alberto, Hof Björn
Max Planck Institute for Dynamics and Self Organization, Bunsenstrasse 10, Göttingen, Germany.
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2009 Feb 13;367(1888):589-99. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2008.0199.
As reported in a number of recent studies, turbulence in pipe flow is transient for Re<2000 and the flow eventually always returns to the laminar state. Generally, the lifetime of turbulence has been observed to increase rapidly with Reynolds number but there is currently no accord on the exact scaling behaviour. In particular, it is not clear whether a critical point exists where turbulence becomes sustained or if it remains transient. We here aim to clarify if these conflicting results may have been caused by the different experimental and numerical protocols used to trigger turbulence in these studies.
正如最近一些研究所报道的那样,对于雷诺数Re<2000,管道流动中的湍流是瞬态的,并且流动最终总是会回到层流状态。一般来说,已经观察到湍流的寿命随着雷诺数迅速增加,但目前对于确切的标度行为尚无共识。特别是,尚不清楚是否存在一个临界点,在该点处湍流变得持续,或者它是否仍然是瞬态的。我们在此旨在弄清楚这些相互矛盾的结果是否可能是由这些研究中用于引发湍流的不同实验和数值方案所导致的。