Suppr超能文献

威尔科克森-曼-惠特尼检验:是否分层?

Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test: stratify or not?

作者信息

Qu Yongming, Zhao Yan D, Rahardja Dewi

机构信息

Department of Information Science, Eli Lilly and Company, Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, Indiana 46285, USA. qu_yongming@ lilly.com

出版信息

J Biopharm Stat. 2008;18(6):1103-11. doi: 10.1080/10543400802369103.

Abstract

The Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney (WMW) test is the most commonly used nonparametric method to compare two treatments when the underlying distribution of the outcome variable is not normally distributed. In the presence of stratum effects, the van Elteren (vE) test, a stratified WMW test, can be used to adjust for the stratum effect. We provide guidance on how to choose between the two tests in the design phase of clinical trials and in the analysis of clinical data. We show by simulations that both tests preserve the type I error rate regardless of the presence of the stratum effects. Therefore, the test with greater power is preferred. In comparing powers, we found that the WMW test is better when the stratum effects are small, whereas the vE test is better when the stratum effects are large. Finally, when the stratum effects are moderate, the decision depends on the shape of the distribution and the ratio of the number of strata and the number of subjects. In this case, results presented in this article or from similar simulations may be used to determine which test is better.

摘要

当结果变量的基础分布呈非正态分布时, Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney(WMW)检验是比较两种治疗方法最常用的非参数方法。在存在分层效应的情况下,可以使用van Elteren(vE)检验(一种分层WMW检验)来调整分层效应。我们为如何在临床试验的设计阶段以及临床数据分析中在这两种检验之间进行选择提供指导。我们通过模拟表明,无论是否存在分层效应,两种检验均能保持I型错误率。因此,应选择检验效能更高的检验。在比较检验效能时,我们发现当分层效应较小时,WMW检验更好;而当分层效应较大时,vE检验更好。最后,当分层效应为中等时,决策取决于分布的形状以及层数与受试者数量的比例。在这种情况下,可以使用本文给出的结果或类似模拟的结果来确定哪种检验更好。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验