Baron Ida Sue, Ahronovich Margot Davis, Erickson Kristine, Gidley Larson Jennifer C, Litman Fern R
Department of Pediatrics, Inova Fairfax Hospital for Children, Falls Church, Virginia 22042, USA.
Early Hum Dev. 2009 Mar;85(3):191-6. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2008.09.411. Epub 2008 Nov 6.
Extremely low birth weight (ELBW) is an established risk factor for poor neurocognitive outcome, particularly when severe intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) complicates the neonatal course. Those born <26 weeks gestational age (GA) are at greatest risk, their outcomes poorer than later born ELBW children. Outcomes of GA subgroups of ELBW uncomplicated by severe IVH have not been well described.
To compare neurocognitive and behavioral outcomes of those born < and >or=26 weeks for an ELBW cohort treated in a single center with extremely low IVH incidence.
Single center retrospective observational cohort study of <or=1000 g survivors born between 1998-2000, using standardized tests of cognition, academic achievement, executive function, attention, language, memory, motor/visual-motor skill, parent and teacher behavioral questionnaires.
ELBW participants (mean age: 6.85+/-0.79) had a mean General Cognitive Ability of 101.4+/-13.05; no significant differences found between <26 weeks (98.19+/-12.48) and >or=26 weeks (102.97+/-13.21) subgroups. No neurocognitive, achievement, or behavioral score was impaired (>or=2 SDs below the normative mean). Subgroup comparisons were nonsignificant after controlling for BW and maternal education, except for >or=26 week advantage for phoneme analysis. Poorer, but low average, performances were found for motor dexterity/coordination, spatial working memory, and selective attention.
Age-appropriate neurocognitive and behavioral function of ELBW survivors suggests outcome may be predicted based on IVH incidence as opposed to birth weight or GA. Factors leading to decreased IVH incidence deserve further study, via single- and cross-center methodologies, to enhance decision-making regarding resuscitation and care of these highly at-risk neonates.
极低出生体重(ELBW)是神经认知预后不良的既定风险因素,尤其是当严重脑室内出血(IVH)使新生儿病程复杂化时。那些孕周小于26周(GA)的婴儿风险最大,其预后比孕周较大的ELBW儿童更差。未并发严重IVH的ELBW各孕周亚组的预后尚未得到充分描述。
比较在单一中心接受治疗且IVH发生率极低的ELBW队列中,孕周小于26周和大于或等于26周的婴儿的神经认知和行为预后。
对1998年至2000年间出生的体重小于或等于1000克的存活者进行单中心回顾性观察队列研究,使用认知、学业成绩、执行功能、注意力、语言、记忆、运动/视觉运动技能的标准化测试,以及家长和教师行为问卷。
ELBW参与者(平均年龄:6.85±0.79)的平均一般认知能力为101.4±13.05;孕周小于26周(98.19±12.48)和大于或等于26周(102.97±13.21)的亚组之间未发现显著差异。没有神经认知、成绩或行为评分受损(低于正常均值≥2个标准差)。在控制出生体重和母亲教育程度后,亚组比较无显著差异,但音素分析方面孕周大于或等于26周有优势。在运动灵活性/协调性、空间工作记忆和选择性注意力方面表现较差,但处于平均水平。
ELBW存活者与年龄相符的神经认知和行为功能表明,预后可能基于IVH发生率而非出生体重或孕周来预测。导致IVH发生率降低的因素值得通过单中心和多中心方法进行进一步研究,以加强对这些高危新生儿复苏和护理的决策。