Suppr超能文献

主动脉瓣位双叶机械瓣膜或生物瓣膜患者的多普勒导管差异

Doppler-catheter discrepancies in patients with bileaflet mechanical prostheses or bioprostheses in the aortic valve position.

作者信息

Aljassim Obaid, Svensson Gunnar, Houltz Erik, Bech-Hanssen Odd

机构信息

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg, Sweden.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 2008 Nov 15;102(10):1383-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.07.017. Epub 2008 Sep 11.

Abstract

The aims of the present study were to investigate in vivo Doppler-catheter discrepancies in aortic bileaflet mechanical and stented biologic valves and evaluate whether these can be predicted using Doppler echocardiography. Results of in vitro studies of bileaflet mechanical valves suggested overestimation using Doppler gradients. Findings in stented biologic valves were conflicting. Patients who underwent valve replacement with a St. Jude Medical mechanical (n = 14, size 19 to 29) or a St. Jude Medical Biocor (Biocor, n = 13, size 21 to 25) valve were included. Simultaneous continuous Doppler recordings (transesophageal transducer) and left ventricular and aortic pressure measurements were performed using high-fidelity catheters. Gradients after pressure recovery were predicted from Doppler using a validated equation. Doppler overestimated catheter gradients in both the mechanical and Biocor. Mean Doppler catheter differences for the mechanical/Biocor were for mean gradients of 4 +/- 3 (SD; p = 0.002)/6 +/- 4 mm Hg (p = 0.002). There was a strong relation between catheter and Doppler gradients (r = 0.85 to 0.92). Doppler catheter discrepancy as a percentage of the Doppler mean gradient for the mechanical was median 41% (range -30% to 76%) and for the Biocor was median 35% (range -7% to 75%). The catheter-Doppler discrepancy was not significant using the predicted net gradient from Doppler. In conclusion, this was the first in vivo investigation of prosthetic valves using simultaneous Doppler and high-fidelity catheters. Doppler overestimated catheter gradients in both mechanical and stented biologic valves. However, the discrepancy can be predicted considering pressure recovery in the aorta.

摘要

本研究的目的是调查主动脉双叶机械瓣膜和带支架生物瓣膜在体内的多普勒导管差异,并评估是否可以使用多普勒超声心动图对这些差异进行预测。双叶机械瓣膜的体外研究结果表明,使用多普勒梯度会出现高估情况。带支架生物瓣膜的研究结果存在矛盾。纳入了接受圣犹达医疗机械瓣膜(n = 14,尺寸19至29)或圣犹达医疗生物瓣膜(生物瓣膜,n = 13,尺寸21至25)置换的患者。使用高保真导管同时进行连续多普勒记录(经食管换能器)以及左心室和主动脉压力测量。使用经过验证的公式从多普勒预测压力恢复后的梯度。在机械瓣膜和生物瓣膜中,多普勒均高估了导管梯度。机械瓣膜/生物瓣膜的平均多普勒导管差异,对于平均梯度而言,分别为4±3(标准差;p = 0.002)/6±4 mmHg(p = 0.002)。导管梯度与多普勒梯度之间存在很强的相关性(r = 0.85至0.92)。机械瓣膜的多普勒导管差异占多普勒平均梯度的百分比中位数为41%(范围-30%至76%),生物瓣膜为中位数35%(范围-7%至75%)。使用从多普勒预测的净梯度时,导管-多普勒差异不显著。总之,这是首次使用同步多普勒和高保真导管对人工瓣膜进行的体内研究。在机械瓣膜和带支架生物瓣膜中,多普勒均高估了导管梯度。然而,考虑到主动脉中的压力恢复,可以预测这种差异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验