Hajizadeh Hila, Akbari Majid, Ghavamnasiri Marjaneh, Abedini Sara
Department of Operative Dentistry of the Mashhad Dental School and Dental Research Center at Mashhad University of Medical Sciences in Mashhad, Iran.
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2008 Nov 1;9(7):9-16.
The aim of this randomized, double blind clinical trial was to compare three lining materials (Adper Prompt L-Pop, VivaSens, and Copalite) versus unlined restorations on postoperative cold sensitivity of class I amalgam restorations.
Potential subjects were screened for the presence of four initial class I carious lesions on posterior teeth. Each tooth was assigned to treatments according to a randomized block design. After cavity preparation, teeth were lined with either VivaSens, Adper Prompt L-Pop, or Copalite, and one tooth remained unlined and served as a control. The cavities were filled with high copper amalgam (Oralloy). The time taken for a subject to respond to a standardized cold stimulus (CRM) was recorded at baseline, 24 hours, one week, and one month after treatment. Participants filled out a self-report questionnaire at each time point. Data was gathered by analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Duncan Multiple Comparisons tests (alpha=0.05).
Twenty subjects participated in this study. Comparisons within each group found no significant reduction in mean CRM for the Adper Prompt L-Pop group (P>0.05), but a significant difference in mean CRM for the VivaSens group was observed at one week and one month intervals after restoration (P<0.05). Copalite and the unlined groups showed significant mean CRM reductions after one day (P<0.05). No significant differences between groups receiving Adper Prompt L-Pop and Copalite were found at any time point (P>0.05). VivaSens showed more cold sensitivity than Adper Prompt L-Pop at one week and one month recalls (P<0.05), while the most cold sensitivity was found in the unlined group.
Adper Prompt L-Pop and Copalite reduced postoperative sensitivity to cold more than VivaSens and unlined groups at all assessment time points, 24 hours, one week, and one-month post treatment. The subjects receiving Copalite, VivaSens, and unlined restorations experienced greater sensitivity to cold at one month compared to baseline, while subjects receiving the Adper Prompt L-Pop liner experienced no greater sensitivity to cold from baseline to one month.
Adper Prompt L-Pop as a liner under spherical high copper amalgam successfully reduced cold postoperative sensitivity.
本随机双盲临床试验的目的是比较三种垫底材料(Adper Prompt L-Pop、VivaSens和Copalite)与未垫底修复体对I类银汞合金修复体术后冷敏感的影响。
筛选后牙有四个初始I类龋损的潜在受试者。根据随机区组设计将每颗牙齿分配至各治疗组。窝洞预备后,牙齿分别用VivaSens、Adper Prompt L-Pop或Copalite垫底,一颗牙齿不垫底作为对照。窝洞用高铜银汞合金(Oralloy)充填。在基线、治疗后24小时、1周和1个月记录受试者对标准化冷刺激(CRM)作出反应所需的时间。参与者在每个时间点填写一份自我报告问卷。数据通过方差分析(ANOVA)和邓肯多重比较检验收集(α=0.05)。
20名受试者参与了本研究。每组内比较发现,Adper Prompt L-Pop组的平均CRM无显著降低(P>0.05),但VivaSens组在修复后1周和1个月时平均CRM有显著差异(P<0.05)。Copalite组和未垫底组在1天后平均CRM显著降低(P<0.05)。在任何时间点,接受Adper Prompt L-Pop和Copalite的组之间均未发现显著差异(P>0.05)。在1周和1个月回访时,VivaSens比Adper Prompt L-Pop表现出更高的冷敏感性(P<0.05),而未垫底组的冷敏感性最高。
在治疗后24小时、1周和1个月的所有评估时间点,Adper Prompt L-Pop和Copalite比VivaSens组和未垫底组更能降低术后冷敏感性。接受Copalite、VivaSens和未垫底修复体的受试者在1个月时比基线时对冷更敏感,而接受Adper Prompt L-Pop垫底的受试者从基线到1个月对冷的敏感性没有增加。
Adper Prompt L-Pop作为球形高铜银汞合金下的垫底材料成功降低了术后冷敏感性。