Suppr超能文献

基于树脂的脱敏剂和自酸蚀粘结剂对降低银汞合金修复体术后敏感性的临床评价

Clinical evaluation of a resin-based desensitizing agent and a self-etching adhesive on the reduction of postoperative sensitivity of amalgam restorations.

作者信息

Hajizadeh Hila, Akbari Majid, Ghavamnasiri Marjaneh, Abedini Sara

机构信息

Department of Operative Dentistry of the Mashhad Dental School and Dental Research Center at Mashhad University of Medical Sciences in Mashhad, Iran.

出版信息

J Contemp Dent Pract. 2008 Nov 1;9(7):9-16.

Abstract

AIM

The aim of this randomized, double blind clinical trial was to compare three lining materials (Adper Prompt L-Pop, VivaSens, and Copalite) versus unlined restorations on postoperative cold sensitivity of class I amalgam restorations.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Potential subjects were screened for the presence of four initial class I carious lesions on posterior teeth. Each tooth was assigned to treatments according to a randomized block design. After cavity preparation, teeth were lined with either VivaSens, Adper Prompt L-Pop, or Copalite, and one tooth remained unlined and served as a control. The cavities were filled with high copper amalgam (Oralloy). The time taken for a subject to respond to a standardized cold stimulus (CRM) was recorded at baseline, 24 hours, one week, and one month after treatment. Participants filled out a self-report questionnaire at each time point. Data was gathered by analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Duncan Multiple Comparisons tests (alpha=0.05).

RESULTS

Twenty subjects participated in this study. Comparisons within each group found no significant reduction in mean CRM for the Adper Prompt L-Pop group (P>0.05), but a significant difference in mean CRM for the VivaSens group was observed at one week and one month intervals after restoration (P<0.05). Copalite and the unlined groups showed significant mean CRM reductions after one day (P<0.05). No significant differences between groups receiving Adper Prompt L-Pop and Copalite were found at any time point (P>0.05). VivaSens showed more cold sensitivity than Adper Prompt L-Pop at one week and one month recalls (P<0.05), while the most cold sensitivity was found in the unlined group.

CONCLUSION

Adper Prompt L-Pop and Copalite reduced postoperative sensitivity to cold more than VivaSens and unlined groups at all assessment time points, 24 hours, one week, and one-month post treatment. The subjects receiving Copalite, VivaSens, and unlined restorations experienced greater sensitivity to cold at one month compared to baseline, while subjects receiving the Adper Prompt L-Pop liner experienced no greater sensitivity to cold from baseline to one month.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Adper Prompt L-Pop as a liner under spherical high copper amalgam successfully reduced cold postoperative sensitivity.

摘要

目的

本随机双盲临床试验的目的是比较三种垫底材料(Adper Prompt L-Pop、VivaSens和Copalite)与未垫底修复体对I类银汞合金修复体术后冷敏感的影响。

方法和材料

筛选后牙有四个初始I类龋损的潜在受试者。根据随机区组设计将每颗牙齿分配至各治疗组。窝洞预备后,牙齿分别用VivaSens、Adper Prompt L-Pop或Copalite垫底,一颗牙齿不垫底作为对照。窝洞用高铜银汞合金(Oralloy)充填。在基线、治疗后24小时、1周和1个月记录受试者对标准化冷刺激(CRM)作出反应所需的时间。参与者在每个时间点填写一份自我报告问卷。数据通过方差分析(ANOVA)和邓肯多重比较检验收集(α=0.05)。

结果

20名受试者参与了本研究。每组内比较发现,Adper Prompt L-Pop组的平均CRM无显著降低(P>0.05),但VivaSens组在修复后1周和1个月时平均CRM有显著差异(P<0.05)。Copalite组和未垫底组在1天后平均CRM显著降低(P<0.05)。在任何时间点,接受Adper Prompt L-Pop和Copalite的组之间均未发现显著差异(P>0.05)。在1周和1个月回访时,VivaSens比Adper Prompt L-Pop表现出更高的冷敏感性(P<0.05),而未垫底组的冷敏感性最高。

结论

在治疗后24小时、1周和1个月的所有评估时间点,Adper Prompt L-Pop和Copalite比VivaSens组和未垫底组更能降低术后冷敏感性。接受Copalite、VivaSens和未垫底修复体的受试者在1个月时比基线时对冷更敏感,而接受Adper Prompt L-Pop垫底的受试者从基线到1个月对冷的敏感性没有增加。

临床意义

Adper Prompt L-Pop作为球形高铜银汞合金下的垫底材料成功降低了术后冷敏感性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验