Huang Baojun, Zheng Xinyu, Wang Zhenning, Wang Meixian, Dong Yulan, Zhao Bo, Xu Huimian
Department of Surgical Oncology, The First Hospital of China Medical University, 155, North Nanjing Street, Heping District, Shenyang, 110001, China.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2009 Jan;16(1):61-7. doi: 10.1245/s10434-008-0193-7. Epub 2008 Nov 8.
Metastatic lymph node (MLN) is less frequently involved in early gastric cancer (EGC) and barely exceeds six in number. The prognostic value of the 5th edition of the UICC tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) node classification appears to be less accurate when applied to patients with EGC and needs to be further stratified. Three hundred twenty-three EGC patients were enrolled into this study. Prognoses of these patients were first assessed based on the 5th edition UICC TNM classification, followed by a reevaluation in which the prognoses of patients were further stratified according to the number of MLNs involved with an increment of one node at a time. A new node classification was proposed based on the correlation between prognoses and the number of positive nodes. According to the prognostic value, a new node classification was categorized as new N0 (0 MLN), new N1 (1-3 MLNs), new N2 (4-6 MLNs), and new N3 (>6 MLNs). While the survival of N0 and N1 groups based on the 5th edition UICC TNM classification appeared to be homogeneous (p = 0.0947), significant difference was unmasked between the new N2 and new N0/N1 groups (p < 0.001). In addition, differentiation status, vessel involvement, and new node classification were identified as independent prognostic factors by multivariate analysis for EGC. We conclude that subsets exist in patients with EGC at stage IB by UICC classification; patients with >/=4 MLNs are at higher risk of recurrence and surgical outcome in this population is relatively poor.
转移性淋巴结(MLN)在早期胃癌(EGC)中较少受累,且数量很少超过6个。国际抗癌联盟(UICC)肿瘤-淋巴结-转移(TNM)分期第5版应用于EGC患者时,其预后价值似乎不太准确,需要进一步分层。本研究纳入了323例EGC患者。首先根据UICC TNM分期第5版评估这些患者的预后,然后进行重新评估,根据受累MLN的数量每次增加1个节点对患者的预后进行进一步分层。基于预后与阳性节点数量之间的相关性,提出了一种新的节点分类。根据预后价值,新的节点分类分为新N0(0个MLN)、新N1(1-3个MLN)、新N2(4-6个MLN)和新N3(>6个MLN)。基于UICC TNM分期第5版,N0和N1组的生存率似乎是同质的(p = 0.0947),而新N2组与新N0/N1组之间存在显著差异(p < 0.001)。此外,多因素分析确定分化状态、血管受累和新的节点分类为EGC的独立预后因素。我们得出结论,UICC分类为IB期的EGC患者存在亚组;MLN≥4个的患者复发风险较高,该人群的手术结果相对较差。