社区医院中商用计算机化医嘱录入系统的现场评估
Field evaluation of commercial Computerized Provider Order Entry systems in community hospitals.
作者信息
Guappone Kenneth P, Ash Joan S, Sittig Dean F
机构信息
Oregon Health & Science University, Portland,OR, USA.
出版信息
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2008 Nov 6;2008:263-7.
Abstract
Computerized Provider Order Entry (CPOE) is an important component of the electronic health record, but there has been some difficulty with user acceptance, and this is often due to poor computer interface usability which disrupts clinician workflow. This qualitative research employed usability engineering methods to study community hospital physicians using commercial CPOE systems while in a naturalistic context. Numerous usability problems were uncovered with this effective technique. Field usability testing should be considered in all institutions implementing CPOE or other clinical computer applications as a means of improving the usability and acceptance of those systems.
摘要
计算机化医嘱录入系统（CPOE）是电子健康记录的重要组成部分，但在用户接受方面存在一些困难，这通常是由于计算机界面可用性差，扰乱了临床医生的工作流程。这项定性研究采用可用性工程方法，在自然环境中研究社区医院医生使用商业CPOE系统的情况。通过这种有效技术发现了许多可用性问题。在所有实施CPOE或其他临床计算机应用程序的机构中，都应考虑进行现场可用性测试，作为提高这些系统的可用性和可接受性的一种手段。
相似文献
1
Field evaluation of commercial Computerized Provider Order Entry systems in community hospitals.社区医院中商用计算机化医嘱录入系统的现场评估
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2008 Nov 6;2008:263-7.
2
Community hospital physician adoption of a CPOE system: perceptions of readiness, usefulness, and satisfaction.社区医院医生对计算机化医嘱录入系统的采用：对准备情况、有用性和满意度的看法
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2007 Oct 11:1117.
3
Optimizing the user interface of a data entry module for an electronic patient record for cardiac rehabilitation: A mixed method usability approach.优化心脏康复电子病历数据录入模块的用户界面：一种混合方法可用性研究
Int J Med Inform. 2016 Mar;87:15-26. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.12.007. Epub 2015 Dec 15.
4
5
The value of Retrospective and Concurrent Think Aloud in formative usability testing of a physician data query tool.回顾性与并发出声思维法在医生数据查询工具形成性可用性测试中的价值
J Biomed Inform. 2015 Jun;55:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2015.02.006. Epub 2015 Feb 27.
6
CPOE system design aspects and their qualitative effect on usability.计算机化医嘱录入（CPOE）系统设计方面及其对可用性的定性影响。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2008;136:309-14.
7
Usability evaluation at the point-of-care: a method to identify user information needs in CPOE applications.床边护理点的可用性评估：一种识别临床医嘱录入应用中用户信息需求的方法。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2006;2006:1137.
8
Computerized physician order entry usage in North America: the doctor is in.北美地区计算机化医师医嘱录入系统的使用情况：医生已接入。
Healthc Q. 2008;11(3):94-7.
9
Physician satisfaction with transition from CPOE to paper-based prescription.医生对从计算机化医师医嘱录入（CPOE）过渡到纸质处方的满意度。
Int J Med Inform. 2017 Jul;103:42-48. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.04.007. Epub 2017 Apr 10.
10
Usability evaluation of order sets in a computerised provider order entry system.计算机化医嘱录入系统中医嘱集的可用性评估。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2011 Nov;20(11):932-40. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs.2010.050021. Epub 2011 Jul 31.
引用本文的文献
1
An appraisal of published usability evaluations of electronic health records via systematic review.通过系统评价对已发表的电子健康记录可用性评估进行评价。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Jan;24(1):218-226. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocw046. Epub 2016 Apr 23.
2
Physicians' and Nurses' Opinions about the Impact of a Computerized Provider Order Entry System on Their Workflow.医生和护士对计算机化医嘱录入系统对其工作流程影响的看法。
Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2015 Nov 1;12(Fall):1g. eCollection 2015.
3
The influence of computerized decision support on prescribing during ward-rounds: are the decision-makers targeted?计算机化决策支持对查房期间处方的影响：决策者是否为目标人群？
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011 Nov-Dec;18(6):754-9. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000135. Epub 2011 Jun 14.
4
Comparison of clinical knowledge management capabilities of commercially-available and leading internally-developed electronic health records.比较商业化和领先内部开发的电子健康记录的临床知识库管理能力。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2011 Feb 17;11:13. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-11-13.
本文引用的文献
1
Evaluation and certification of computerized provider order entry systems.计算机化医嘱录入系统的评估与认证
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007 Jan-Feb;14(1):48-55. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2248. Epub 2006 Oct 31.
2
Types of unintended consequences related to computerized provider order entry.与计算机化医嘱录入相关的非预期后果类型。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006 Sep-Oct;13(5):547-56. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2042. Epub 2006 Jun 23.
3
Systematic review: impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care.系统评价：健康信息技术对医疗质量、效率和成本的影响
Ann Intern Med. 2006 May 16;144(10):742-52. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-144-10-200605160-00125. Epub 2006 Apr 11.
4
Overcoming barriers to adopting and implementing computerized physician order entry systems in U.S. hospitals.克服美国医院采用和实施计算机化医师医嘱录入系统的障碍。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2004 Jul-Aug;23(4):184-90. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.23.4.184.
5
Cognitive and usability engineering methods for the evaluation of clinical information systems.用于评估临床信息系统的认知与可用性工程方法。
J Biomed Inform. 2004 Feb;37(1):56-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2004.01.003.
6
Principles for a successful computerized physician order entry implementation.计算机化医师医嘱录入系统成功实施的原则。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2003;2003:36-40.
7
Computer physician order entry: benefits, costs, and issues.计算机医嘱录入：益处、成本及问题
Ann Intern Med. 2003 Jul 1;139(1):31-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-139-1-200307010-00010.
Zotero 插件