Liang Bryan A, Lew Robert, Zivin Justin A
Institute of Health Law Studies, California Western School of Law, San Diego, CA 92101, USA.
Arch Neurol. 2008 Nov;65(11):1429-33. doi: 10.1001/archneur.65.11.1429.
The use of tissue plasminogen activator in ischemic stroke is controversial. Many practicing physicians believe that its usefulness is established, while others, including professional specialty societies, are less sanguine. A review of the literature appears to show that the use of tissue plasminogen activator is efficacious and can result in highly improved outcomes for a majority of eligible patients. These findings may implicate important potential legal issues. Informed consent concerns and, potentially, medical malpractice claims may result, particularly in the context of evidence-based practice, pay for performance, and the currently limited use of tissue plasminogen activator for eligible patients.
在缺血性卒中中使用组织型纤溶酶原激活剂存在争议。许多执业医生认为其有效性已得到证实,而包括专业学会在内的其他人则不那么乐观。文献综述似乎表明,使用组织型纤溶酶原激活剂是有效的,并且可以使大多数符合条件的患者获得显著改善的预后。这些发现可能涉及重要的潜在法律问题。可能会引发知情同意方面的担忧以及医疗事故索赔,特别是在循证医学实践、按绩效付费以及目前符合条件的患者使用组织型纤溶酶原激活剂有限的情况下。