• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

个人支付作为在线样本中的一种长期激励措施。

Individual payments as a longer-term incentive in online panels.

作者信息

Göritz Anja S, Wolff Hans-Georg, Goldstein Daniel G

机构信息

University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Nuremberg, Germany.

出版信息

Behav Res Methods. 2008 Nov;40(4):1144-9. doi: 10.3758/BRM.40.4.1144.

DOI:10.3758/BRM.40.4.1144
PMID:19001406
Abstract

Does it pay to pay online panel members? A three-wave longitudinal experiment was conducted with an online panel to examine whether per person payments, paid through an online intermediary, influence response and retention rates. In the payment condition, participants were promised payment for participation at each wave, whereas control participants were not offered any payment. The promise of a payment had a negative effect on response in Wave 1, but a positive effect on response in Wave 2. Payment had no significant effect on retention. Completing a given wave was an indicator for responding to a subsequent invitation.

摘要

向在线调查小组成员付费是否值得?我们对一个在线调查小组进行了一项三阶段的纵向实验,以检验通过在线中介机构支付的每人报酬是否会影响回复率和留存率。在付费条件下,参与者被承诺在每个阶段参与调查都会获得报酬,而对照组参与者则没有得到任何报酬。报酬承诺在第一阶段对回复率有负面影响,但在第二阶段对回复率有正面影响。报酬对留存率没有显著影响。完成给定阶段是对后续邀请做出回复的一个指标。

相似文献

1
Individual payments as a longer-term incentive in online panels.个人支付作为在线样本中的一种长期激励措施。
Behav Res Methods. 2008 Nov;40(4):1144-9. doi: 10.3758/BRM.40.4.1144.
2
[Evaluation of an online discussion forum for depressive patients and their relatives--an examination focussing motives and effects of participation].[针对抑郁症患者及其亲属的在线讨论论坛评估——聚焦参与动机与效果的考察]
Neuropsychiatr. 2009;23(1):42-51.
3
A comparison of stimulus ratings made online and in person: gender and method effects.在线和当面评估刺激物的比较:性别和方法的影响。
Behav Res Methods. 2010 Feb;42(1):273-85. doi: 10.3758/BRM.42.1.273.
4
Monopoly money: the effect of payment coupling and form on spending behavior.垄断货币:支付耦合与形式对消费行为的影响
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2008 Sep;14(3):213-25. doi: 10.1037/1076-898X.14.3.213.
5
Incentive payments to academic anesthesiologists for late afternoon work did not influence turnover times.向学术麻醉医生支付下午晚些时候工作的激励报酬并不会影响周转时间。
Anesth Analg. 2009 May;108(5):1622-6. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31819e7504.
6
Medicare program; changes to the hospital inpatient prospective payment system for acute care hospitals and fiscal year 2010 rates; and changes to the long-term care hospital prospective payment system and rate years 2010 and 2009 rates. Final rules and interim final rule with comment period.医疗保险计划;急性护理医院住院病人前瞻性支付系统的变更及2010财年费率;以及长期护理医院前瞻性支付系统的变更及2010年和2009年费率。最终规则及有意见征求期的暂行最终规则。
Fed Regist. 2009 Aug 27;74(165):43753-4236.
7
Shyness 3: randomized controlled trial of guided versus unguided Internet-based CBT for social phobia.羞怯3:基于互联网的指导性与非指导性认知行为疗法治疗社交恐惧症的随机对照试验
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2008 Dec;42(12):1030-40. doi: 10.1080/00048670802512107.
8
Attempts to quit smoking and relapse: factors associated with success or failure from the ATTEMPT cohort study.戒烟尝试与复吸:来自ATTEMPT队列研究的成功或失败相关因素
Addict Behav. 2009 Apr;34(4):365-73. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2008.11.013. Epub 2008 Nov 24.
9
The Expert Patients Programme online, a 1-year study of an Internet-based self-management programme for people with long-term conditions.在线专家患者计划,一项针对慢性病患者的基于互联网的自我管理计划的为期一年的研究。
Chronic Illn. 2008 Dec;4(4):247-56. doi: 10.1177/1742395308098886.
10
The combined influence of central and peripheral routes in the online persuasion process.在线说服过程中中枢路径和外周路径的联合影响。
Cyberpsychol Behav. 2009 Jun;12(3):299-308. doi: 10.1089/cpb.2008.0188.

引用本文的文献

1
The day-of-invitation effect on participation in web-based studies.邀请当日对参与基于网络研究的影响。
Behav Res Methods. 2022 Aug;54(4):1841-1853. doi: 10.3758/s13428-021-01716-0. Epub 2021 Oct 28.
2
Retention strategies in longitudinal cohort studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.纵向队列研究中的保留策略:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Nov 26;18(1):151. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0586-7.
3
Survey Satisficing Inflates Stereotypical Responses in Online Experiment: The Case of Immigration Study.
在线实验中调查满意度会夸大刻板反应:以移民研究为例
Front Psychol. 2016 Oct 18;7:1563. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01563. eCollection 2016.