Caudrelier J M, Vermandel M, Betrouni N, Nyiri B, Cameron I, Rousseau J
Department of Radiation Oncology, Ottawa Hospital Regional Cancer Centre, Ottawa, Canada.
Br J Radiol. 2009 Mar;82(975):228-34. doi: 10.1259/bjr/33222418. Epub 2008 Nov 11.
The authors have previously evaluated a new method of volume reconstruction and quantification from MR images, based on fuzzy logic (FL) principles. The technique is evaluated here for larger and more complex structures by investigating its accuracy and robustness using MR and CT images. Four large (50-71 cm(3)) and complex (e.g. mimicking a prostate) structures were created and imaged on MR and CT scanners, both with increasing slice thickness. Contours were delineated to generate 112 volumes. MR and CT images were processed using the FL method and a "classical" method of reconstruction on research software. In addition, the CT images were also processed on commercial virtual simulation software. Calculated volumes were compared with actual volumes. The mean +/- standard deviation of the relative variations in calculated target volume using the FL method was found to be 4.4%+/-2.8%, whereas with the "classical" method it was 23.7%+/-6% from axial MR images and 23.3%+/-9.8% from CT images. With the "classical" method, the relative variations in calculated volumes rise with increasing slice thickness, and the displayed volumes show deformations in the longitudinal direction. With the FL method, the volume calculation is not sensitive to the slice thickness and so the deformations are minimal. When used with MR images, our FL method of volume reconstruction is accurate and robust with respect to changes in slice thickness. For CT images, the results are encouraging but some work is still needed to improve the accuracy of the FL method.
作者此前已评估了一种基于模糊逻辑(FL)原理从磁共振成像(MR)图像进行体积重建和量化的新方法。在此,通过使用MR和CT图像研究其准确性和稳健性,对该技术在更大、更复杂的结构上进行评估。创建了四个大体积(50 - 71立方厘米)且复杂(例如模拟前列腺)的结构,并在MR和CT扫描仪上成像,切片厚度均逐渐增加。勾勒轮廓以生成112个体积。使用FL方法和研究软件上的“经典”重建方法对MR和CT图像进行处理。此外,还在商业虚拟模拟软件上对CT图像进行处理。将计算得到的体积与实际体积进行比较。使用FL方法计算目标体积的相对变化的均值±标准差为4.4%±2.8%,而使用“经典”方法时,从轴向MR图像计算的相对变化为23.7%±6%,从CT图像计算的相对变化为23.3%±9.8%。使用“经典”方法时,计算体积的相对变化随切片厚度增加而上升,且显示的体积在纵向方向上出现变形。使用FL方法时,体积计算对切片厚度不敏感,因此变形最小。当与MR图像一起使用时,我们的FL体积重建方法在切片厚度变化方面准确且稳健。对于CT图像,结果令人鼓舞,但仍需要一些工作来提高FL方法的准确性。