Jecker Nancy S
University of Washington School of Medicine, Department of Bioethics and Humanities, Seattle, WA 98195-7120, USA.
Am J Bioeth. 2008 Oct;8(10):2-10. doi: 10.1080/15265160802478412.
In this paper I argue that a narrow view of justice dominates the bioethics literature. I urge a broader view. As bioethicists, we often conceive of justice using a medical model. This model focuses attention at a particular point in time, namely, when someone who is already sick seeks access to scarce or expensive services. A medical model asks how we can fairly distribute those services. The broader view I endorse requires looking upstream, and asking how disease and suffering came about. In contrast to a medical model, a social model of justice considers how social determinants affect the health of a population. For example, social factors such as access to clean drinking water, education, safe workplaces, and police protection, profoundly affect risk for disease and early death. I examine one important social determinant of health, health care coverage, to show the limits of a medical model and the merits of a broader view.
在本文中,我认为对正义的狭义理解主导着生物伦理学文献。我主张一种更宽泛的观点。作为生物伦理学家,我们常常使用医学模式来构想正义。这种模式将注意力集中在特定的时间点,即当已经患病的人寻求获得稀缺或昂贵的服务时。医学模式关注的是我们如何能够公平地分配这些服务。我所赞同的更宽泛的观点要求我们向上游探寻,追问疾病和痛苦是如何产生的。与医学模式不同,社会正义模式考虑社会决定因素如何影响人群的健康。例如,诸如获得清洁饮用水、教育、安全的工作场所和警察保护等社会因素,会深刻影响患病风险和过早死亡风险。我考察健康的一个重要社会决定因素——医疗保健覆盖范围,以展示医学模式的局限性和更宽泛观点的优点。