Tharavanij Thipaporn, Betancourt Arthur, Messinger Shari, Cure Pablo, Leitao Cristiane B, Baidal David A, Froud Tatiana, Ricordi Camillo, Alejandro Rodolfo
Diabetes Research Institute, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33136, USA.
Transplantation. 2008 Nov 15;86(9):1161-7. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e31818a7f45.
Health related quality of life (HRQoL) is one of the most important outcomes to measure effectiveness of an intervention, especially for islet transplantation in which benefits should outweigh risks of long-term immunosuppression. This study aimed to evaluate long-term effects of islet transplantation and to outline possible influential factors.
Forty islet transplant recipients who completed 344 Health Status Questionnaires (HSQ 2.0) and 384 Diabetes Quality of Life Questionnaires (DQoL) between 2000 and 2007 were retrospectively reviewed. Assessments were analyzed in pretransplantation period, then every 3 months after the first infusion for 18 months and every 6 months thereafter. The mean follow-up posttransplantation was 40.8+/-21.9 months (9-72 months).
Sustained improvement in DQoL-impact score was observed at all time-points posttransplantation. Similarly, worry and satisfaction scales were significantly better than pretransplant evaluation for most time-points. Four of eight HSQ 2.0 scales demonstrated a significant improvement at some time-points. Longitudinal analysis, after adjustments for potential confounding factors, showed significantly sustained improvement in impact scale up to 72 months. Longer diabetes duration, higher insulin dosage, and occurrence of adverse events had negative effects on HRQoL. Single islet infusion or islet after kidney transplant recipients showed the lowest values in HSQ 2.0. In contrast, subjects on exenatide therapy had significantly higher HSQ 2.0 scores.
Islet transplantation is associated with long-term improvement in HRQoL. Exenatide usage had a positive effect whereas single islet infusion, islet after kidney transplantation, longer diabetes duration, higher insulin dosage, and adverse events had a negative impact on HRQoL scores.
健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)是衡量干预措施有效性的最重要结果之一,尤其是对于胰岛移植而言,其益处应超过长期免疫抑制的风险。本研究旨在评估胰岛移植的长期效果,并概述可能的影响因素。
回顾性分析了2000年至2007年间完成344份健康状况问卷(HSQ 2.0)和384份糖尿病生活质量问卷(DQoL)的40名胰岛移植受者。在移植前进行评估,然后在首次输注后的18个月内每3个月进行一次评估,此后每6个月进行一次评估。移植后的平均随访时间为40.8±21.9个月(9 - 72个月)。
在移植后的所有时间点均观察到DQoL影响评分持续改善。同样,在大多数时间点,担忧和满意度量表均显著优于移植前评估。HSQ 2.0的八个量表中有四个在某些时间点显示出显著改善。在对潜在混杂因素进行调整后的纵向分析显示,直至72个月时,影响量表仍有显著的持续改善。糖尿病病程较长、胰岛素剂量较高以及不良事件的发生对HRQoL有负面影响。单次胰岛输注或肾移植后胰岛移植受者在HSQ 2.0中的得分最低。相比之下,接受艾塞那肽治疗的受试者HSQ 2.0得分显著更高。
胰岛移植与HRQoL的长期改善相关。使用艾塞那肽有积极作用,而单次胰岛输注、肾移植后胰岛移植、糖尿病病程较长、胰岛素剂量较高以及不良事件对HRQoL评分有负面影响。