Suppr超能文献

使用线段二等分任务的新变体分析单侧忽略中的非运动偏差。

Analysing non-motor bias in unilateral neglect with a new variant of the line bisection task.

作者信息

Chiba Yu, Haga Nobuhiko

机构信息

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Japan.

出版信息

Brain Inj. 2008 Nov;22(12):952-9. doi: 10.1080/02699050802471315.

Abstract

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE

To develop a new variant of the line-bisection task for assessing non-motor (attentional, representational, etc.) bias in unilateral neglect (UN), i.e. the exactly bisected line selection task (EBLST).

METHODS AND PROCEDURES

Nine patients with UN were included in this study. In the EBLST, multiple horizontal lines, bisected in various proportions, were presented. The participants chose the most equally bisected line and then pointed to the bisector of the chosen line. To avoid the influence of motor bias, the participants used perceptual judgement first. The conventional line-bisection task was also performed. The deviation of the subjective midpoint was measured for each participant in both tasks.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND RESULTS

Eight participants showed obvious rightward deviation in the EBLST, thus resulting in being classified as patients with non-motor neglect. Five participants showed greater deviation in the EBLST than in the line-bisection task.

CONCLUSION

Non-motor function in patients with UN was successfully assessed by the EBLST.

摘要

主要目标

开发一种用于评估单侧忽视(UN)中非运动(注意力、表征等)偏差的线平分任务的新变体,即精确平分线选择任务(EBLST)。

方法与步骤

本研究纳入了9例单侧忽视患者。在EBLST中,呈现了多条以不同比例平分的水平线。参与者选择最等分的线,然后指向所选线的平分线。为避免运动偏差的影响,参与者首先使用感知判断。还进行了传统的线平分任务。在两项任务中均测量了每位参与者主观中点的偏差。

主要结果

8名参与者在EBLST中表现出明显的向右偏差,因此被归类为非运动忽视患者。5名参与者在EBLST中的偏差大于在线平分任务中的偏差。

结论

EBLST成功评估了单侧忽视患者的非运动功能。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验