Kil Uk Hyun, Jung Hae Ok, Koh Yoon Seok, Park Hun Jun, Park Chan Seok, Kim Pum Joon, Baek Sang-Hong, Seung Ki-Bae, Choi Kyu-Bo
Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kangnam St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
Clin Cardiol. 2008 Nov;31(11):531-7. doi: 10.1002/clc.20305.
The causes and prognosis of pericardial effusion (PE) may be different according to time, region, economy, and hospital. This study was performed to evaluate the etiology, clinical outcome, and prognosis of patients with large, symptomatic PE treated by echo-guided pericardiocentesis at Kangnam St. Mary's Hospital (the Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea).
According to etiologies of large, symptomatic PE, the prognosis of patients may be different.
We reviewed 116 consecutive patients who underwent echo-guided pericardiocentesis due to large, symptomatic PE over the last 12 y. The Kaplan-Meier survival curve with log-rank method was applied for the survival analysis.
Procedural success rate of echo-guided pericardiocentesis was 99.1%. Common causes of PE requiring pericardiocentesis were lung cancer (27.6%), tuberculosis (TB) (13.8%), and uremia (6.9%). The mortality rate of 6 mo after the pericardiocentesis was 80.3% in malignant PE, whereas the over-all mortality rate was 18.2% in nonmalignant PE (p < 0.0001). Among the malignant PE, lung cancer (27.6%) and breast cancers (6.9%) were the most common causes. The mean cytologic detection rate and mean life expectancy of malignant PE were 44% and 5-7 mo. Patients with breast cancer and lymphoma had relatively better life expectancy (11.4 and 7.7 mo), whereas those with stomach cancer and metastases of unknown origin (MUO) had poorer prognosis (1.2 and 2.3 mo). The most common causes of nonmalignant PE were TB, uremia, and iatrogenic, and their mean life expectancy was approximately 54 mo.
Malignancy, especially lung cancer and TB, were the most common causes of large symptomatic PE. The prognosis of large symptomatic PE was related to the underlying disease. Malignant PE was associated with the poorest prognosis.
心包积液(PE)的病因及预后可能因时间、地区、经济状况及医院不同而有所差异。本研究旨在评估韩国首尔天主教大学江南圣母医院经超声引导心包穿刺术治疗的大量有症状PE患者的病因、临床结局及预后。
根据大量有症状PE的病因,患者的预后可能不同。
我们回顾了过去12年中因大量有症状PE接受超声引导心包穿刺术的116例连续患者。采用Kaplan-Meier生存曲线及对数秩检验进行生存分析。
超声引导心包穿刺术的操作成功率为99.1%。需要心包穿刺术的PE的常见病因是肺癌(27.6%)、结核病(TB)(13.8%)和尿毒症(6.9%)。心包穿刺术后6个月,恶性PE的死亡率为80.3%,而非恶性PE的总体死亡率为18.2%(p<0.0001)。在恶性PE中,肺癌(27.6%)和乳腺癌(6.9%)是最常见的病因。恶性PE的平均细胞学检出率和平均预期寿命分别为44%和5 - 7个月。乳腺癌和淋巴瘤患者的预期寿命相对较好(分别为11.4个月和7.7个月),而胃癌和不明原发灶转移(MUO)患者的预后较差(分别为1.2个月和2.3个月)。非恶性PE最常见的病因是TB、尿毒症和医源性因素,其平均预期寿命约为54个月。
恶性肿瘤,尤其是肺癌和TB,是大量有症状PE最常见的病因。大量有症状PE的预后与基础疾病有关。恶性PE的预后最差。