Suppr超能文献

迷路后与乙状窦后前庭神经切断术的分析。

An analysis of the retrolabyrinthine vs. the retrosigmoid vestibular nerve section.

作者信息

Glasscock M E, Thedinger B A, Cueva R A, Jackson C G

机构信息

Otology Group, PC, Nashville, TN 37203.

出版信息

Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1991 Jan;104(1):88-95. doi: 10.1177/019459989110400116.

Abstract

Vestibular neurectomy is gaining widespread acceptance as a primary means of controlling medically refractory vertigo. However, debate continues over the adequacy of vestibular neurectomy within the cerebellopontine angle, long-term control, and the most appropriate surgical approach. To address these issues, we retrospectively reviewed 118 patients who underwent vestibular neurectomy between October 1984 and January 1988. Forty-two patients who underwent a retrolabyrinthine approach and 44 patients who underwent a retrosigmoid approach completed a written questionnaire and provided a recent audiogram. According to American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery guidelines, complete or substantial vertigo control was achieved and maintained in 95% of patients in both surgical groups. Hearing, tinnitus, and fullness results over the long term are variable. The advantages and disadvantages of the various vestibular neurectomy approaches will be detailed. On review of our results and surgical experience, we now prefer the retrosigmoid approach.

摘要

前庭神经切除术作为控制药物难治性眩晕的主要手段正得到广泛认可。然而,关于小脑脑桥角前庭神经切除术的充分性、长期控制以及最合适的手术入路仍存在争议。为解决这些问题,我们回顾性分析了1984年10月至1988年1月期间接受前庭神经切除术的118例患者。42例行迷路后入路手术的患者和44例行乙状窦后入路手术的患者完成了一份书面问卷并提供了近期听力图。根据美国耳鼻咽喉头颈外科学会指南,两个手术组中95%的患者实现并维持了完全或基本的眩晕控制。听力、耳鸣和耳闷的长期结果各不相同。将详细阐述各种前庭神经切除术入路的优缺点。回顾我们的结果和手术经验,我们现在更倾向于乙状窦后入路。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验