Norden Andrew D, Drappatz Jan, Wen Patrick Y
Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Lancet Neurol. 2008 Dec;7(12):1152-60. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70260-6.
Despite optimum treatment with surgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy, most patients with malignant glioma have a poor prognosis. Malignant gliomas are vascular tumours that produce vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), which is an important mediator of angiogenesis. Preclinical data indicate that angiogenesis is essential for the proliferation and survival of malignant glioma cells, which suggests that inhibition of angiogenesis might be an effective therapeutic strategy. Anti-angiogenic therapies that target VEGF and the VEGF receptor (VEGFR) are effective adjuncts to the treatment of solid tumours. Normalisation of dilated and leaky tumour vasculature might also enable anti-angiogenic therapy to increase the efficacy of radiation therapy and cytotoxic chemotherapy.
Several studies have investigated the use of bevacizumab--a humanised monoclonal antibody against VEGF--for patients with recurrent malignant glioma. Treatment with bevacizumab is commonly combined with cytotoxic chemotherapy and results in dramatic responses seen on radiographs, prolongation of progression-free survival, and less need for corticosteroids. Similar results have been shown with small-molecule inhibitors of VEGFR, such as cediranib. Anti-angiogenic treatment is generally well tolerated but common adverse effects include hypertension and proteinuria, whereas the potentially more serious adverse effects, such as thromboembolic disease and haemorrhage, occur infrequently. At least half of patients fail to respond to anti-angiogenic treatment and the response duration is variable. Resistance to anti-angiogenic therapy might implicate alternative pro-angiogenic factors, such as basic fibroblast growth factor, stromal-derived factor-1alpha, the angiopoietin receptor Tie2, and placental growth factor. Anti-angiogenic therapy might also lead to mobilisation of circulating endothelial cells towards the tumour, which supports angiogenesis. Another possible mechanism of resistance of malignant glioma cells might be upregulation of pro-invasive molecules, which would result in increased infiltrative tumour growth along the blood vessels. WHERE NEXT?: Although anti-angiogenic therapies are promising, the duration of response with available regimens is modest. Continuing investigations will determine whether these drugs are best used for newly diagnosed or recurrent tumours and will establish the optimum combinations with radiation, cytotoxic chemotherapy, and other targeted molecular compounds. As yet, there are no effective treatments for patients on anti-angiogenic therapies whose tumours progress. Further understanding of the mechanisms of resistance to anti-angiogenic therapies and better selection of patients will be crucial to improve outcomes for patients with malignant glioma.
尽管采用手术、放射治疗和化疗进行了最佳治疗,但大多数恶性胶质瘤患者的预后仍然很差。恶性胶质瘤是产生血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)的血管性肿瘤,VEGF是血管生成的重要介质。临床前数据表明,血管生成对于恶性胶质瘤细胞的增殖和存活至关重要,这表明抑制血管生成可能是一种有效的治疗策略。靶向VEGF和VEGF受体(VEGFR)的抗血管生成疗法是实体瘤治疗的有效辅助手段。扩张且渗漏的肿瘤血管正常化也可能使抗血管生成疗法提高放射治疗和细胞毒性化疗的疗效。
多项研究调查了贝伐单抗(一种抗VEGF的人源化单克隆抗体)用于复发性恶性胶质瘤患者的情况。贝伐单抗治疗通常与细胞毒性化疗联合使用,可在影像学上产生显著反应,延长无进展生存期,并减少对皮质类固醇的需求。VEGFR小分子抑制剂(如西地尼布)也显示出类似结果。抗血管生成治疗一般耐受性良好,但常见不良反应包括高血压和蛋白尿,而潜在更严重的不良反应(如血栓栓塞性疾病和出血)则较少见。至少一半的患者对抗血管生成治疗无反应,且反应持续时间各不相同。对抗血管生成治疗的耐药可能涉及其他促血管生成因子,如碱性成纤维细胞生长因子、基质衍生因子-1α、血管生成素受体Tie2和胎盘生长因子。抗血管生成治疗还可能导致循环内皮细胞向肿瘤移动,从而支持血管生成。恶性胶质瘤细胞耐药的另一种可能机制可能是促侵袭分子上调,这会导致肿瘤沿血管浸润性生长增加。
尽管抗血管生成疗法前景广阔,但现有方案的反应持续时间有限。持续的研究将确定这些药物是否最适合用于新诊断或复发性肿瘤,并确定与放射治疗、细胞毒性化疗和其他靶向分子化合物的最佳联合方式。目前,对于肿瘤进展的接受抗血管生成治疗的患者尚无有效治疗方法。进一步了解抗血管生成治疗的耐药机制并更好地选择患者对于改善恶性胶质瘤患者的预后至关重要。