Suppr超能文献

替米沙坦可改善高肾素非调节型盐敏感性高血压患者的胰岛素抵抗。

Telmisartan improves insulin resistance in high renin nonmodulating salt-sensitive hypertensives.

作者信息

Sanchez Ramiro A, Masnatta Lucas D, Pesiney Carolina, Fischer Patricia, Ramirez Agustín José

机构信息

Hypertension Section and Metabolic Unit, Fundación Favaloro, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

出版信息

J Hypertens. 2008 Dec;26(12):2393-8. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e328312677e.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Nonmodulating (NMHT) is a high-renin subtype of salt sensitive hypertension, which additionally develops insulin resistance and oxidative stress. Conversely, modulating hypertensives (MHT) normally regulates renal hemodynamics after high sodium intake without metabolic impairment. We postulate that telmisartan, an angiotensin receptor blocker with partial peroxisome proliferators-activated receptorgamma partial agonist, may improve insulin resistance compared with ramipril, an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) in NMHT.

METHODS

We studied 18 NMTH (32 +/- 5y nine men, BMI 29 +/- 3 kg/m2) and 16 MHT (34 +/- 4, 10 men, BMI 28 +/- 5 kg/m2) before and after the crossover administration of ramipril 10 mg (3 months) or telmisartan 80 mg (3 months). In each patient studied we measured, before and after each treatment period, office blood pressure, glycemia and insulinemia before and 60 and 120 min after a glucose overload (75 g), total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein and low-density lipoprotein fractions, triglycerides and highly sensitive C-protein-reactive protein. After that, HOMA-IR Index was calculated.

RESULTS

Plasma renin activity was higher in NMHT 4.4 +/- 0.5 than MHT 2.6 +/- 0.9 ng.ml.h; P < 0.01. Blood pressure was similarly reduced either in MHT or NMHT by ramipril (MHT: from 159 +/- 10/102 +/- 4 to 142 +/- 6/93 +/- 3 mmHg, P < 0.05; NMHT: from 162 +/- 12/97 +/- 4 to 139 +/- 7/89 +/- 2 mmHg, P < 0.05) or telmisartan (MHT: from 154 +/- 8/96 +/- 5 to 137 +/- 6/88 +/- 4 mmHg, P < 0.05; NMHT: from 161 +/- 9/96 +/- 5 to 137 +/- 5/86 +/- 3 mmHg, P < 0.05). In NMHT, fasting glycemia (99 +/- 10 mg%) and insulinemia (16 +/- 4 microU%) and 120 min glycemia (110 +/- 2 mg%) and insulinemia (57 +/- 9 microU%) were higher than in MHT (fasting: 92 +/- 8 mg% and 9.2 +/- 2 mU%; 120 min: 95 +/- 5 and 21 +/- 5 microU%, P < 0.05). In MHT, after 3 months treatment with either ramipril or telmisartan no changes were found in fasting and 120 min glycemia and insulinemia. In NMHT, telmisartan, after 3 months treatment, significantly reduced fasting and 120 min insulinemia (fasting: 8.4 +/- 2, 120 min: 25 +/- 10 microU%; P < 0.01) compared either to basal values or ramipril treatment. Similarly, only in NMHT, compared with basal values and ramipril treatment, telmisartan improved the HOMA-IR index in both MHT (2.76 +/- 0.16 to 2.24 +/- 0.18, P < 0.05) and NMHT (from: 4.4 +/- 1 to 2.3 +/- 0.7) and triglyceride plasma levels (MHT: from 139 +/- 1.85 to 122 +/- 2.4 mg%, P < 0.05; NMHT: from: 223 +/- 12 to 146 +/- 10 mg%, P < 0.01). Finally, highly sensitive C-protein-reactive protein values were higher in NMHT (0.33 +/- 0.07 mg.dl) than in MHT (0.14 +/- 0.06 mg.dl; P < 0.01). Both treatments reduced highly sensitive C-protein-reactive protein in NMHT. (ramipril from 0.32 +/- 0.05 mg.dl to 0.26 +/- 0.06 m.dl (P < 0.05) and telmisartan from 0.34 +/- 0.05+/- to 0.20 +/- 0.05 mg.dl (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that the improvement of the insulin sensitivity by telmisartan, instead of a similar effect on blood pressure shown by both drugs, could be ascribed to the PPAR agonistic action of telmisartan. This opens an interesting therapeutic approach for patients with hypertension and altered glycemic metabolism.

摘要

背景

非调节性高血压(NMHT)是盐敏感性高血压的一种高肾素亚型,还会出现胰岛素抵抗和氧化应激。相反,调节性高血压(MHT)在高钠摄入后通常能调节肾血流动力学,且无代谢损害。我们推测,替米沙坦作为一种具有部分过氧化物酶体增殖物激活受体γ激动剂作用的血管紧张素受体阻滞剂,与雷米普利(一种血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂,ACEI)相比,可能改善NMHT患者的胰岛素抵抗。

方法

我们研究了18例NMHT患者(32±5岁,男性9例,体重指数29±3kg/m²)和16例MHT患者(34±4岁,男性10例,体重指数28±5kg/m²),在交叉服用10mg雷米普利(3个月)或80mg替米沙坦(3个月)之前和之后进行观察。在每例研究患者中,在每个治疗期前后,测量诊室血压、葡萄糖负荷(75g)前及后60分钟和120分钟的血糖和胰岛素水平、总胆固醇、高密度脂蛋白和低密度脂蛋白组分、甘油三酯以及高敏C反应蛋白。之后,计算HOMA-IR指数。

结果

NMHT患者的血浆肾素活性为4.4±0.5ng.ml.h,高于MHT患者的2.6±0.9ng.ml.h;P<0.01。雷米普利(MHT:从159±10/102±4降至142±6/93±3mmHg,P<0.05;NMHT:从162±12/97±4降至139±7/89±2mmHg,P<0.05)或替米沙坦(MHT:从154±8/96±5降至137±6/88±4mmHg,P<0.05;NMHT:从161±9/96±5降至137±5/86±3mmHg,P<0.05)均能使MHT和NMHT患者的血压同样降低。在NMHT患者中,空腹血糖(99±10mg%)、胰岛素水平(16±4μU%)以及120分钟血糖(110±2mg%)和胰岛素水平(57±9μU%)均高于MHT患者(空腹:92±8mg%和9.2±2mU%;120分钟:95±5和21±5μU%,P<0.05)。在MHT患者中,用雷米普利或替米沙坦治疗3个月后,空腹及120分钟血糖和胰岛素水平均无变化。在NMHT患者中,替米沙坦治疗3个月后,与基础值或雷米普利治疗相比,空腹及120分钟胰岛素水平显著降低(空腹:8.4±2,120分钟:25±10μU%;P<0.01)。同样,仅在NMHT患者中,与基础值和雷米普利治疗相比,替米沙坦使MHT患者(从2.76±0.16降至2.24±0.18,P<0.05)和NMHT患者(从4.4±1降至2.3±0.7)的HOMA-IR指数以及甘油三酯血浆水平均得到改善(MHT:从139±1.85降至122±2.4mg%,P<0.05;NMHT:从223±12降至146±10mg%,P<0.01)。最后,NMHT患者的高敏C反应蛋白值(0.33±0.07mg/dl)高于MHT患者(0.14±0.06mg/dl;P<0.01)。两种治疗均使NMHT患者的高敏C反应蛋白降低。(雷米普利从0.32±0.05mg/dl降至0.26±0.06mg/dl(P<0.05),替米沙坦从0.34±0.05mg/dl降至0.20±0.05mg/dl(P<0.01)。

结论

我们的数据表明,替米沙坦改善胰岛素敏感性,而非两种药物对血压的相似作用,可能归因于替米沙坦的PPAR激动作用。这为高血压合并糖代谢异常患者开辟了一种有趣的治疗方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验