Suppr超能文献

关于血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂、血管紧张素受体拮抗剂和直接肾素抑制剂治疗原发性高血压患者的比较效果的更新报告:更多的数据,几乎没有新信息。

Updated report on comparative effectiveness of ACE inhibitors, ARBs, and direct renin inhibitors for patients with essential hypertension: much more data, little new information.

机构信息

Durham VA Medical Center, 508 Fulton Street, Durham, NC 27705, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Jun;27(6):716-29. doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1938-8. Epub 2011 Dec 7.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

A 2007 systematic review compared angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) in patients with hypertension. Direct renin inhibitors (DRIs) have since been introduced, and significant new research has been published. We sought to update and expand the 2007 review.

DATA SOURCES

We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE (through December 2010) and selected other sources for relevant English-language trials.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA, PARTICIPANTS, AND INTERVENTIONS: We included studies that directly compared ACE inhibitors, ARBs, and/or DRIs in at least 20 total adults with essential hypertension; had at least 12 weeks of follow-up; and reported at least one outcome of interest. Ninety-seven (97) studies (36 new since 2007) directly comparing ACE inhibitors versus ARBs and three studies directly comparing DRIs to ACE inhibitor inhibitors or ARBs were included.

STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS

A standard protocol was used to extract data on study design, interventions, population characteristics, and outcomes; evaluate study quality; and summarize the evidence.

RESULTS

In spite of substantial new evidence, none of the conclusions from the 2007 review changed. The level of evidence remains high for equivalence between ACE inhibitors and ARBs for blood pressure lowering and use as single antihypertensive agents, as well as for superiority of ARBs for short-term adverse events (primarily cough). However, the new evidence was insufficient on long-term cardiovascular outcomes, quality of life, progression of renal disease, medication adherence or persistence, rates of angioedema, and differences in key patient subgroups.

LIMITATIONS

Included studies were limited by follow-up duration, protocol heterogeneity, and infrequent reporting on patient subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS OF KEY FINDINGS

Evidence does not support a meaningful difference between ACE inhibitors and ARBs for any outcome except medication side effects. Few, if any, of the questions that were not answered in the 2007 report have been addressed by the 36 new studies. Future research in this area should consider areas of uncertainty and be prioritized accordingly.

摘要

目的

2007 年的一项系统评价比较了血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)抑制剂和血管紧张素 II 受体阻滞剂(ARB)在高血压患者中的作用。自那时以来,直接肾素抑制剂(DRI)已经问世,并且发表了大量新的研究成果。我们试图更新和扩展 2007 年的综述。

数据来源

我们检索了 MEDLINE 和 EMBASE(截至 2010 年 12 月),并为相关的英文试验选择了其他来源。

研究入选标准、参与者和干预措施:我们纳入了直接比较 ACE 抑制剂、ARB 和/或 DRI 在至少 20 例原发性高血压成人中的作用的研究;随访时间至少 12 周;并报告了至少一个感兴趣的结果。97 项(2007 年后有 36 项新研究)直接比较 ACE 抑制剂与 ARB 的研究和 3 项直接比较 DRI 与 ACE 抑制剂或 ARB 的研究被纳入。

研究评估和综合方法

使用标准方案提取研究设计、干预措施、人群特征和结局的数据;评估研究质量;并总结证据。

结果

尽管有大量新的证据,但 2007 年综述的结论没有改变。ACE 抑制剂和 ARB 降低血压和作为单一抗高血压药物的疗效相当,以及 ARB 短期不良反应(主要是咳嗽)优于 ACE 抑制剂的证据仍然很高。然而,关于长期心血管结局、生活质量、肾脏疾病进展、药物依从性或持久性、血管紧张性水肿发生率以及关键患者亚组差异的新证据不足。

局限性

纳入的研究受到随访时间、方案异质性和患者亚组报告频率低的限制。

结论和关键发现的意义

除药物副作用外,ACE 抑制剂和 ARB 对任何结局均无明显差异。在 2007 年报告未回答的问题中,很少有(如果有的话)可以通过 36 项新研究得到解答。该领域的未来研究应考虑不确定性的领域,并相应地确定优先级。

相似文献

4
Blood pressure lowering efficacy of renin inhibitors for primary hypertension.肾素抑制剂对原发性高血压的降压疗效。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 5;4(4):CD007066. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007066.pub3.
5
Beta-blockers for hypertension.用于治疗高血压的β受体阻滞剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jan 20;1(1):CD002003. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002003.pub5.
6
First-line drugs for hypertension.高血压一线用药。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 18;4(4):CD001841. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001841.pub3.

引用本文的文献

10
Tolerability of Antihypertensive Medications in Older Adults.老年人抗高血压药物的耐受性
Drugs Aging. 2015 Oct;32(10):773-96. doi: 10.1007/s40266-015-0296-3.

本文引用的文献

6
Effect of valsartan on the incidence of diabetes and cardiovascular events.缬沙坦对糖尿病和心血管事件发生的影响。
N Engl J Med. 2010 Apr 22;362(16):1477-90. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1001121. Epub 2010 Mar 14.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验