Sanders Richard J, Hammond Sharon L, Rao Neal M
Department Surgery, Rose Medical Center, University of Colorado Health Science Center, Denver, Colorado, USA.
Neurologist. 2008 Nov;14(6):365-73. doi: 10.1097/NRL.0b013e318176b98d.
: Arterial and venous thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) were recognized in the late 1800s and neurogenic TOS in the early 1900s. Diagnosis and treatment of the 2 vascular forms of TOS are generally accepted in all medical circles. On the other hand, neurogenic TOS is more difficult to diagnose because there is no standard objective test to confirm clinical impressions.
: The clinical features of arterial, venous, and neurogenic TOS are described. Because neurogenic TOS is by far the most common type, the pathology, pathophysiology, diagnostic tests, differential and associate diagnoses, and treatment are detailed and discussed. The controversial area of objective and subjective diagnostic criteria is addressed.
: Arterial and venous TOS are usually not difficult to recognize and the diagnosis can be confirmed by angiography. The diagnosis of neurogenic TOS is more challenging because its symptoms of nerve compression are not unique. The clinical diagnosis relies on documenting several positive findings on physical examination. To date there is still no reliable objective test to confirm the diagnosis, but measurements of the medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve appear promising.
动脉型和静脉型胸廓出口综合征(TOS)在19世纪后期被认识,神经型TOS在20世纪初被认识。TOS的两种血管型的诊断和治疗在所有医学界普遍被接受。另一方面,神经型TOS更难诊断,因为没有标准的客观检查来证实临床印象。
描述了动脉型、静脉型和神经型TOS的临床特征。由于神经型TOS是迄今为止最常见的类型,因此对其病理、病理生理学、诊断检查、鉴别诊断和相关诊断以及治疗进行了详细阐述和讨论。探讨了客观和主观诊断标准这一有争议的领域。
动脉型和静脉型TOS通常不难识别,血管造影可证实诊断。神经型TOS的诊断更具挑战性,因为其神经受压症状并非独特。临床诊断依赖于记录体格检查中的多项阳性发现。迄今为止,仍没有可靠的客观检查来证实诊断,但前臂内侧皮神经的测量似乎很有前景。