Sepponen Anna, Lehtimäki Lauri, Huhtala Heini, Kaila Minna, Kankaanranta Hannu, Moilanen Eeva
The Immunopharmacology Research Group, Medical School, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland.
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2008 Dec;43(12):1242-8. doi: 10.1002/ppul.20953.
Exhaled nitric oxide (NO) concentration is a marker of pulmonary inflammation. It is usually measured at a single exhalation flow rate. However, measuring exhaled NO at multiple flow rates allows assessment of the flow-independent NO parameters: alveolar NO concentration, bronchial NO flux, bronchial wall NO concentration, and bronchial diffusing capacity of NO. Our aim was to determine the flow-independent NO parameters in healthy schoolchildren and to compare two different mathematical approaches. Exhaled NO was measured at four flow rates (10, 50, 100, and 200 ml/sec) in 253 schoolchildren (7-13 years old). Flow-independent NO parameters were calculated with linear method (flows >or=50 ml/sec) and non-linear method (all flows). Sixty-six children (32 boys and 34 girls) with normal spirometry and no history or present symptoms of asthma, allergy, atopy or other diseases were included in the analysis. Median bronchial NO flux was 0.4 nl/sec (mean +/- SD: 0.5 +/- 0.3 nl/sec) and median alveolar NO concentration was 1.9 ppb (2.0 +/- 0.8 ppb) with the linear method. Bronchial NO flux correlated positively with height (r = 0.423; P < 0.001), FEV(1) (r = 0.358; P = 0.003), and FVC (r = 0.359; P = 0.003). With the non-linear method, median bronchial wall NO concentration was 49.6 ppb (68.0 +/- 53.3 ppb) and bronchial diffusing capacity of NO was 10.0 pl/sec/ppb (11.8 +/- 7.5 pl/sec/ppb). The non-linear method gave lower alveolar NO concentration (1.4 [1.5 +/- 0.7] ppb, P < 0.001) and higher bronchial NO flux (0.5 [0.6 +/- 0.3] nl/sec, P < 0.001) than the linear method, but the results were highly correlated between the two methods (r = 0.854 and r = 0.971, P < 0.001). In conclusion, the multiple flow rate method is feasible in children but different mathematical methods give slightly different results. Reference values in healthy children are of value when applying bronchial and alveolar NO parameters in the diagnostics and follow-up of inflammatory lung diseases.
呼出一氧化氮(NO)浓度是肺部炎症的一个标志物。它通常在单一呼气流量下进行测量。然而,在多个流量下测量呼出NO可评估与流量无关的NO参数:肺泡NO浓度、支气管NO通量、支气管壁NO浓度以及NO的支气管扩散能力。我们的目的是确定健康学童中与流量无关的NO参数,并比较两种不同的数学方法。对253名7至13岁的学童在四个流量(10、50、100和200毫升/秒)下测量呼出NO。使用线性方法(流量≥50毫升/秒)和非线性方法(所有流量)计算与流量无关的NO参数。66名肺活量测定正常且无哮喘、过敏、特应性或其他疾病病史及当前症状的儿童(32名男孩和34名女孩)被纳入分析。采用线性方法时,支气管NO通量中位数为0.4纳升/秒(均值±标准差:0.5±0.3纳升/秒),肺泡NO浓度中位数为1.9十亿分比(2.0±0.8十亿分比)。支气管NO通量与身高呈正相关(r = 0.423;P < 0.001)、与第一秒用力呼气容积(FEV₁)呈正相关(r = 0.358;P = 0.003)以及与用力肺活量(FVC)呈正相关(r = 0.359;P = 0.003)。采用非线性方法时,支气管壁NO浓度中位数为49.6十亿分比(68.0±53.3十亿分比),NO的支气管扩散能力为10.0皮升/秒/十亿分比(11.8±7.5皮升/秒/十亿分比)。与线性方法相比,非线性方法得出的肺泡NO浓度较低(1.4 [1.5±0.7]十亿分比,P < 0.001),支气管NO通量较高(0.5 [0.6±0.3]纳升/秒,P < 0.001),但两种方法的结果高度相关(r = 0.854和r = 0.971,P < 0.001)。总之,多流量法在儿童中是可行的,但不同的数学方法得出的结果略有不同。在将支气管和肺泡NO参数应用于炎症性肺部疾病的诊断和随访时,健康儿童的参考值具有重要意义。