Stevens Kathryn J, Busse Reed F, Han Eric, Brau Anja C S, Beatty Philip J, Beaulieu Christopher F, Gold Garry E
Department of Radiology, Stanford University Medical Center, 300 Pasteur Dr, Room S-062A, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Radiology. 2008 Dec;249(3):1026-33. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2493080227.
The purpose of this prospective study was to compare a new isotropic three-dimensional (3D) fast spin-echo (FSE) pulse sequence with parallel imaging and extended echo train acquisition (3D-FSE-Cube) with a conventional two-dimensional (2D) FSE sequence for magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of the ankle. After institutional review board approval and informed consent were obtained and in accordance with HIPAA privacy guidelines, MR imaging was performed in the ankles of 10 healthy volunteers (four men, six women; age range, 25-41 years). Imaging with the 3D-FSE-Cube sequence was performed at 3.0 T by using both one-dimensional- and 2D-accelerated autocalibrated parallel imaging to decrease imaging time. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) with 3D-FSE-Cube were compared with those of the standard 2D FSE sequence. Cartilage, muscle, and fluid SNRs were significantly higher with the 3D-FSE-Cube sequence (P < .01 for all). Fluid-cartilage CNR was similar for both techniques. The two sequences were also compared for overall image quality, blurring, and artifacts. No significant difference for overall image quality and artifacts was demonstrated between the 2D FSE and 3D-FSE-Cube sequences, although the section thickness in 3D-FSE-Cube imaging was much thinner (0.6 mm). However, blurring was significantly greater on the 3D-FSE-Cube images (P < .04). The 3D-FSE-Cube sequence with isotropic resolution is a promising new MR imaging sequence for viewing complex joint anatomy.
这项前瞻性研究的目的是将一种新的各向同性三维(3D)快速自旋回波(FSE)脉冲序列(采用并行成像和扩展回波链采集,即3D-FSE-Cube)与传统的二维(2D)FSE序列用于踝关节的磁共振(MR)成像进行比较。在获得机构审查委员会批准和知情同意并符合健康保险流通与责任法案(HIPAA)隐私准则后,对10名健康志愿者(4名男性,6名女性;年龄范围25 - 41岁)的踝关节进行了MR成像。使用3D-FSE-Cube序列在3.0 T下成像,采用一维和二维加速自动校准并行成像以缩短成像时间。将3D-FSE-Cube序列的信噪比(SNR)和对比噪声比(CNR)与标准2D FSE序列的进行比较。3D-FSE-Cube序列的软骨、肌肉和液体SNR显著更高(均P <.01)。两种技术的液体-软骨CNR相似。还对这两种序列的整体图像质量、模糊度和伪影进行了比较。2D FSE和3D-FSE-Cube序列之间在整体图像质量和伪影方面未显示出显著差异,尽管3D-FSE-Cube成像中的层厚要薄得多(0 .6 mm)。然而,3D-FSE-Cube图像上的模糊度显著更大(P <.04)。具有各向同性分辨率的3D-FSE-Cube序列是一种用于观察复杂关节解剖结构的有前景的新MR成像序列。