• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[重症医学认证的(无)意义。合适指标体系的检测问题]

[The (non)sense of certification in intensive care medicine. The problem of the detection of suitable indicator systems].

作者信息

Vagts D A, Bauer M, Martin J

机构信息

Klinik und Poliklinik für Anästhesiologie und Intensivtherapie, Universität Rostock, Schillingallee 35, 18057 Rostock, Deutschland.

出版信息

Anaesthesist. 2009 Jan;58(1):81-7. doi: 10.1007/s00101-008-1465-0.

DOI:10.1007/s00101-008-1465-0
PMID:19011815
Abstract

Certification is a compulsory element of today's quality management. However, the instruments used for certification have mostly originally been developed for industrial purposes. Even with tried and tested adaptation to hospital structures, transferring these instruments to the medical environment implies partial negligence of outcome quality. This fact is due to the multidimensional structure of medical outcome quality, which cannot be reduced to only one indicator. This review describes the necessity to develop a specific indicator system, which is needed for an objective, reliable and valid system of certification for intensive care units. The second part of the review describes the current efforts which are being undertaken to develop such a certification system for German intensive care units. Until this new system has been validated, certification of intensive care units is of limited value for evaluating the quality of intensive care units in Germany.

摘要

认证是当今质量管理的一个强制性要素。然而,用于认证的工具最初大多是为工业目的而开发的。即便经过了对医院结构的反复验证和调整,将这些工具应用于医疗环境仍意味着对结果质量的部分忽视。这一事实源于医疗结果质量的多维结构,它不能仅仅归结为一个指标。本综述阐述了开发特定指标体系的必要性,这是重症监护病房客观、可靠且有效的认证体系所必需的。综述的第二部分描述了目前为德国重症监护病房开发此类认证体系所做的努力。在这个新体系得到验证之前,重症监护病房的认证对于评估德国重症监护病房的质量价值有限。

相似文献

1
[The (non)sense of certification in intensive care medicine. The problem of the detection of suitable indicator systems].[重症医学认证的(无)意义。合适指标体系的检测问题]
Anaesthesist. 2009 Jan;58(1):81-7. doi: 10.1007/s00101-008-1465-0.
2
[Quality assurance concepts in intensive care medicine].[重症医学中的质量保证概念]
Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2015 Nov;110(8):575-80, 582-3. doi: 10.1007/s00063-015-0095-y. Epub 2015 Oct 26.
3
Emergency medicine resident interest in critical care fellowship training increases if provided United States certification pathway.如果提供美国认证途径,急诊医学住院医师对重症监护专科培训的兴趣会增加。
Crit Care Med. 2006 Dec;34(12):3066-7; author reply 3067. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000248870.31735.43.
4
[Peer Review for Quality Management in Intensive Care Medicine].[重症监护医学质量管理的同行评审]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2018 Oct;143(21):1532-1540. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-109254. Epub 2018 Oct 18.
5
Intensive care unit quality improvement: a "how-to" guide for the interdisciplinary team.重症监护病房质量改进:跨学科团队实用指南
Crit Care Med. 2006 Jan;34(1):211-8. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000190617.76104.ac.
6
[Quality assurance in intensive care: the situation in Switzerland].
Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1999 Oct 30;129(43):1592-9.
7
[Health services research in intensive care medicine in Germany : Status quo and future challenges exemplified by acute pulmonary failure].[德国重症医学中的卫生服务研究:以急性肺衰竭为例的现状与未来挑战]
Anaesthesist. 2019 Jun;68(6):343-352. doi: 10.1007/s00101-019-0602-2.
8
Continuous improvement of safety in the Intensive Care and Surgical environment according to UNE 179003:2013 standard: 8 years experience.根据UNE 179003:2013标准持续改进重症监护和手术环境中的安全性:八年经验。
Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim (Engl Ed). 2018 Nov;65(9):486-494. doi: 10.1016/j.redar.2018.07.005. Epub 2018 Aug 25.
9
Quality indicators in intensive care medicine: why? Use or burden for the intensivist.重症医学中的质量指标:为何如此?对重症监护医生而言是助力还是负担。
Ger Med Sci. 2010 Sep 28;8:Doc22. doi: 10.3205/000111.
10
The contemporary surgical intensive care unit. Structure, staffing, and issues.当代外科重症监护病房。结构、人员配备及相关问题。
Surg Clin North Am. 2000 Jun;80(3):791-804, vii. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6109(05)70096-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Peer reviewing critical care: a pragmatic approach to quality management.重症监护同行评审:质量管理的务实方法。
Ger Med Sci. 2010 Oct 8;8:Doc23. doi: 10.3205/000112.
2
Quality indicators in intensive care medicine: why? Use or burden for the intensivist.重症医学中的质量指标:为何如此?对重症监护医生而言是助力还是负担。
Ger Med Sci. 2010 Sep 28;8:Doc22. doi: 10.3205/000111.

本文引用的文献

1
[Quality management in health care - continuous improvement of processes and outcomes].[医疗保健中的质量管理——流程与结果的持续改进]
Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 2008 Feb;43(2):156-60. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1060549.
2
[Marketing for hospitals--an issue?].
Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 2007 Sep;42(9):656-60. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-990214.
3
[Evaluation of quality assurance--current data and consequences for research].质量保证评估——当前数据及其对研究的影响
Gesundheitswesen. 2007 May;69(5):277-83. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-981460.
4
[Sepsis therapy--Why change-management of sepsis can lower its lethality].[脓毒症治疗——为何脓毒症的变革管理可降低其致死率]
Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 2006 Oct;41(10):614-24. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-955856.
5
[Process remodeling DRG's, SOP's, clinical pathways and the role of the physician].[疾病诊断相关分组(DRG)、标准操作程序(SOP)、临床路径的流程重塑以及医师的作用]
Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 2006 Mar;41(3):135-6. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-925225.
6
[Quality Management in Hospitals. Relevance of KTQ].[医院质量管理。KTQ的相关性]
Med Klin (Munich). 2005 Mar 15;100(3):149-53. doi: 10.1007/s00063-005-1012-6.
7
[Is there a voucher for the impact of quality assurance/-improvement methods in foreign countries?].国外质量保证/改进方法的影响是否有凭证?
Gesundheitswesen. 2004 Jun;66(6):370-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-813230.
8
[Assessment and certification of hospital care in Germany].[德国医院护理的评估与认证]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2004 Feb;47(2):103-10. doi: 10.1007/s00103-003-0769-0.
9
A randomized evaluation of two health care quality improvement program (HCQIP) interventions to improve the adequacy of hemodialysis care of ESRD patients: feedback alone versus intensive intervention.一项关于两种医疗质量改进计划(HCQIP)干预措施以提高终末期肾病(ESRD)患者血液透析护理充分性的随机评估:单纯反馈与强化干预。
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2004 Mar;15(3):754-60. doi: 10.1097/01.asn.0000115701.51613.d7.
10
Developing and pilot testing quality indicators in the intensive care unit.在重症监护病房制定并进行质量指标的试点测试。
J Crit Care. 2003 Sep;18(3):145-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2003.08.003.