Tripathi M K, Karim S A, Chaturvedi O H, Verma D L
Division of Animal Nutrition, Central Sheep and Wool Research Institute, Avikanagar, Rajasthan, India.
J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl). 2008 Dec;92(6):631-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0396.2007.00759.x.
Three yeast strains, Kluyveromyces marximanus NRRL-3234 (KM), Saccharomyces cerevisiae NCDC-42 (SC) and Saccharomyces uvarum ATCC-9080 (SU), and a mixed culture (1:1:1 ratio) were evaluated for their value as probiotics in lamb feeding in two experiment. In experiment I and II, 20 and 30 pre-weaner lambs were fed for 63 and 60 days in two and three equal groups respectively. All lambs were offered ad libitum a creep mixture and Zizyphus nummularia leaves, and yeasts were dosed orally. In experiment I, one group received no yeast, the other of the mixed culture (1.5-2 x 10(10) live cells/ml). In experiment II, yeast cultivation was modified yielding 1.5-2 x 10(13) live cells/ml. Lambs of the three experimental groups received 1 ml/kg live weight of one of the individual yeasts. Feed intake did not differ among groups of both experiments with the exception of SC-supplemented lambs in experiment II which showed a trend to higher intakes per kg metabolic body weight and in percentage of body weight when compared with KM- and SU-supplemented lambs. Supplementation of the mixed yeast culture had no effect on intakes of digestible crude protein and metabolisable energy, nutrient digestibility, nitrogen balance and rumen fermentation characteristics (pH, ammonia, volatile fatty acid concentration, protozoa count) and urinary allantoin as an indicator of microbial protein synthesis. The same was true for comparisons in experiment II except ciliate protozoa counts, which showed a trend to be the highest with SU and the lowest with SC. The results of present study show that the response of lambs to supplemented live yeast cultures is inconsistent, as it lacked to have an effect in the present study, and that differences among strains were small, even when supplemented at a much higher live cell count.
在两项实验中,对三种酵母菌株,即马克斯克鲁维酵母NRRL - 3234(KM)、酿酒酵母NCDC - 42(SC)和葡萄汁酵母ATCC - 9080(SU)以及一种混合培养物(比例为1:1:1)作为益生菌在羔羊饲养中的价值进行了评估。在实验I和实验II中,分别将20只和30只断奶前羔羊分成两组和三组,每组数量相等,分别饲养63天和60天。所有羔羊均可自由采食开食混合料和枣树叶片,并通过口服方式给予酵母。在实验I中,一组不添加酵母,另一组添加混合培养物(1.5 - 2×10¹⁰个活细胞/毫升)。在实验II中,对酵母培养进行了改良,使其活细胞浓度达到1.5 - 2×10¹³个活细胞/毫升。三个实验组的羔羊每千克体重口服1毫升其中一种单一酵母。除实验II中添加SC的羔羊外,两个实验中各实验组的采食量没有差异。与添加KM和SU的羔羊相比,实验II中添加SC的羔羊每千克代谢体重和占体重百分比的采食量有增加的趋势。添加混合酵母培养物对可消化粗蛋白和代谢能的摄入量、养分消化率、氮平衡以及瘤胃发酵特性(pH值、氨、挥发性脂肪酸浓度、原生动物数量)和作为微生物蛋白质合成指标的尿囊素没有影响。实验II中的比较结果也是如此,除纤毛虫原生动物数量外,SU组的纤毛虫原生动物数量显示出最高的趋势,而SC组最低。本研究结果表明,羔羊对添加活酵母培养物的反应不一致,因为在本研究中未观察到其效果,并且即使以更高的活细胞数量添加,不同菌株之间的差异也很小。