Good Melissa-L, Mitchell Christina A, Pintado Maria R, Douglas William H
Health and Healthcare Research Group, School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen's University Belfast, Grosvenor Rd., Belfast BT12 6BP, UK.
J Dent. 2009 Jan;37(1):65-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2008.09.011. Epub 2008 Nov 14.
To use profilometry to assess the margin surface profile of all-ceramic crowns (ACC's) at try-in and 1-week after cementation with dual-cured resin (DC, RelyX ARC, 3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA), self-adhesive dual-cured resin (SADC, RelyX Unicem, 3M ESPE), light-cured resin (LC, RelyX Veneer, 3M ESPE) or chemically cured resin-modified glass ionomer (RMGI, RelyX Luting Plus, 3M ESPE) luting cement.
Forty, sound, extracted, human, premolar teeth underwent a standardised preparation for ACC's. IPS Empress (Ivoclar-Vivadent, Liechtenstein) crowns of standard dimensions were fabricated and 10 luted with each cement and stored in water for 7 days. Three groups of serial profiles were taken, the first of the tooth preparation, the second of the crown margins at try-in and lastly of the crown margins after cementation and 7 days water storage.
There were no significant differences in the crown margin surface profile between the four cement groups at try-in. The change in crown margin position between try-in and post-cementation was significantly greater for DC than for LC and RMGI. SADC was not significantly different to the other cements. There were no significant differences in the crown margin extensions between the four cement groups, however most of the IPS Empress ACC's in this study were underextended but this was not statistically significant.
IPS Empress ACC's seated more fully with LC and RMGI than with DC cement.
使用轮廓仪评估全瓷冠(ACC)在试戴时以及用双固化树脂(DC,RelyX ARC,3M ESPE,美国明尼苏达州圣保罗)、自粘性双固化树脂(SADC,RelyX Unicem,3M ESPE)、光固化树脂(LC,RelyX Veneer,3M ESPE)或化学固化树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀(RMGI,RelyX Luting Plus,3M ESPE)粘结后1周时的边缘表面轮廓。
40颗完好的拔除人类前磨牙进行ACC的标准化预备。制作标准尺寸的IPS Empress(义获嘉伟瓦登特,列支敦士登)全瓷冠,每种水门汀粘结10颗,并在水中储存7天。拍摄三组连续轮廓,第一组是牙齿预备的轮廓,第二组是试戴时全瓷冠边缘的轮廓,最后一组是粘结后及7天储水后的全瓷冠边缘轮廓。
试戴时,四种水门汀组之间全瓷冠边缘表面轮廓无显著差异。双固化树脂组试戴与粘结后全瓷冠边缘位置的变化显著大于光固化树脂组和化学固化树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀组。自粘性双固化树脂组与其他水门汀组无显著差异。四种水门汀组之间全瓷冠边缘延伸无显著差异,然而本研究中大多数IPS Empress全瓷冠边缘延伸不足,但无统计学意义。
与双固化树脂水门汀相比,IPS Empress全瓷冠与光固化树脂和化学固化树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀的就位更完全。