Ackrill A M, Reid L E, Gilbert C S, Gewert D R, Porter A C, Lewin A R, Stark G R, Kerr I M
Imperial Cancer Research Fund, London, UK.
Nucleic Acids Res. 1991 Feb 11;19(3):591-8. doi: 10.1093/nar/19.3.591.
9-27 mRNA is expressed to a high level in response to both alpha and gamma interferons. In contrast, 6-16 mRNA is expressed well in response to alpha but very poorly in response to gamma interferon in human cells. The factors governing these different levels of expression were investigated. For both genes the major effect of both interferons is on transcription. A transcriptional bias in the 6-16 promoter/enhancer accounts in large part for the differential response of 6-16 to the two interferons. No single DNA element appears responsible; the smaller the 5' region analysed the lower the absolute activity and the smaller the differential response to alpha and gamma interferons observed. Both the 6-16 and 9-27 mRNAs are very stable and no effect of the interferons on stability was detected. Nor was any direct evidence obtained for preferential processing of the 9-27 mRNA. Nevertheless, differentials between the transcription and accumulation of mature mRNAs, particularly for 6-16 mRNA in response to gamma interferon, suggest that post-transcriptional control(s) must additionally operate. The 9-27 5' promoter/enhancer is much less active than that from 6-16 when placed 5' of a marker gene, despite the similar response of the two genes to alpha interferon.
9 - 27 mRNA在对α干扰素和γ干扰素的应答中均高水平表达。相比之下,6 - 16 mRNA在人类细胞中对α干扰素应答良好,但对γ干扰素应答很差。对调控这些不同表达水平的因素进行了研究。对于这两个基因,两种干扰素的主要作用均在于转录。6 - 16启动子/增强子中的转录偏向在很大程度上解释了6 - 16对两种干扰素的不同应答。似乎没有单一的DNA元件起作用;分析的5'区域越小,绝对活性越低,观察到的对α和γ干扰素的差异应答也越小。6 - 16和9 - 27 mRNA都非常稳定,未检测到干扰素对稳定性的影响。也没有获得关于9 - 27 mRNA优先加工的直接证据。然而,成熟mRNA转录与积累之间的差异,特别是6 - 16 mRNA对γ干扰素的应答差异,表明转录后调控必定也在起作用。尽管这两个基因对α干扰素的应答相似,但当9 - 27 5'启动子/增强子置于标记基因的5'端时,其活性远低于6 - 16的启动子/增强子。