Zschocke J, Aulehla-Scholz C, Patton S
Institute of Human Genetics, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
J Inherit Metab Dis. 2008 Dec;31(6):697-702. doi: 10.1007/s10545-008-1052-1. Epub 2008 Nov 21.
DNA sequence analyses have become a major component in the diagnostic work-up of patients; however, limited consideration appears to be given to the possibility that reported results may in fact be wrong. Over the last four years we have carried out an External Quality Assessment scheme for mutation analysis in phenylketonuria. Each year, three DNA samples with previously characterized genotypes were mailed to participating laboratories. Indications for testing were either confirmation of diagnosis and prediction of disease severity, or carrier analysis. Each year there were several laboratories that failed to identify mutations because of methodological limitations. Of the participating laboratories that used comprehensive mutation detection methods, each year there was at least one that missed at least one mutation. Indeed, in the 2007 scheme almost 8% of reports from laboratories that used comprehensive mutation detection methods such as sequencing of all exons of the PAH gene contained incorrect genotypes. There were also serious deficiencies in the interpretation of genotype data: in the 2007 scheme, 6 out of 10 laboratories that obtained full genotyping marks for interpretation incurred a reduction of marks because information on the expected phenotype was missing or wrong. Several laboratories failed to appreciate the clinical relevance of a mutation associated with mild hyperphenylalaninaemia, which does not require treatment, and some discussed the option of prenatal diagnosis in the respective case. In conclusion, mutation analyses may be prone to errors and this demands careful interpretation of results in relation to clinical and biochemical findings.
DNA序列分析已成为患者诊断检查的一个主要组成部分;然而,对于报告结果实际上可能有误的可能性,似乎考虑得较少。在过去四年里,我们开展了一项苯丙酮尿症突变分析的外部质量评估计划。每年,将三个具有先前已鉴定基因型的DNA样本邮寄给参与实验室。检测的目的要么是确诊和预测疾病严重程度,要么是进行携带者分析。每年都有几个实验室由于方法学上的局限性而未能识别出突变。在使用全面突变检测方法的参与实验室中,每年至少有一个实验室遗漏了至少一个突变。事实上,在2007年的计划中,使用诸如PAH基因所有外显子测序等全面突变检测方法的实验室所出具的报告中,近8%包含错误的基因型。在基因型数据的解读方面也存在严重缺陷:在2007年的计划中,10个获得完整基因分型标记以供解读的实验室中有6个因预期表型信息缺失或错误而被扣分。几个实验室没有认识到与轻度高苯丙氨酸血症相关的突变的临床相关性,这种情况不需要治疗,而且一些实验室还讨论了在各自病例中进行产前诊断的选择。总之,突变分析可能容易出错,这就需要结合临床和生化检查结果对结果进行仔细解读。