Suppr超能文献

与战斗相关的创伤后应激障碍程序化干预模型的自然主义比较。

Naturalistic comparison of models of programmatic interventions for combat-related post-traumatic stress disorder.

作者信息

Forbes David, Lewis Virginia, Parslow Ruth, Hawthorne Graeme, Creamer Mark

机构信息

Australian Centre for Posttraumatic Mental Health, Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2008 Dec;42(12):1051-9. doi: 10.1080/00048670802512024.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a difficult-to-treat sequel of combat. Data on effectiveness of alternate treatment structures are important for planning veterans' psychiatric services. The present study compared clinical presentations and treatment outcomes for Australian veterans with PTSD who participated in a range of models of group-based treatment.

METHOD

Participants consisted of 4339 veterans with combat-related PTSD who participated in one of five types of group-based cognitive behavioural programmes of different intensities and settings. Data were gathered at baseline (intake), as well as at 3 and 9 month follow up, on measures of PTSD, anxiety, depression and alcohol misuse. Analyses of variance and effect size analyses were used to investigate differences at intake and over time by programme type.

RESULTS

Small baseline differences by programme intensity were identified. Although significant improvements in symptoms were evident over time for each programme type, no significant differences in outcome were evident between programmes. When PTSD severity was considered, veterans with severe PTSD performed less well in the low-intensity programmes than in the moderate- or high-intensity programmes. Veterans with mild PTSD improved less in high-intensity programmes than in moderate- or low-intensity programmes.

CONCLUSION

Comparable outcomes are evident across programme types. Outcomes may be maximized when veterans participate in programme intensity types that match their level of PTSD severity. When such matching is not feasible, moderate-intensity programmes appear to offer the most consistent outcomes. For regionally based veterans, delivering treatment in their local environment does not detract from, and may even enhance, outcomes. These findings have implications for the planning and purchasing of mental health services for sufferers of PTSD, particularly for veterans of more recent combat or peacekeeping deployments.

摘要

目标

创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)是战斗后难以治疗的后遗症。关于替代治疗结构有效性的数据对于规划退伍军人的精神科服务很重要。本研究比较了参加一系列基于团体治疗模式的澳大利亚PTSD退伍军人的临床表现和治疗结果。

方法

参与者包括4339名患有与战斗相关PTSD的退伍军人,他们参加了五种不同强度和环境的基于团体的认知行为项目之一。在基线(入组时)以及3个月和9个月随访时收集有关PTSD、焦虑、抑郁和酒精滥用的测量数据。采用方差分析和效应量分析来研究入组时和随时间推移不同项目类型之间的差异。

结果

确定了项目强度在基线时有微小差异。尽管每种项目类型的症状随时间推移都有明显改善,但各项目之间在结果上没有明显差异。当考虑PTSD严重程度时,重度PTSD退伍军人在低强度项目中的表现不如在中强度或高强度项目中。轻度PTSD退伍军人在高强度项目中的改善不如在中强度或低强度项目中。

结论

不同项目类型的结果相当。当退伍军人参加与他们PTSD严重程度水平相匹配的项目强度类型时,结果可能会最大化。当这种匹配不可行时,中等强度项目似乎能提供最一致的结果。对于居住在当地的退伍军人,在其当地环境中提供治疗不会降低,甚至可能提高治疗效果。这些发现对PTSD患者,特别是最近参加战斗或维和部署的退伍军人的心理健康服务规划和采购具有启示意义。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验