Tangjitgamol Siriwan, Manusirivithaya Sumonmal, Laopaiboon Malinee, Lumbiganon Pisake
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Bangkok Metropolitan Administration Medical College and Vajira Hospital, Dusit District, Bangkok, Thailand.
Gynecol Oncol. 2009 Jan;112(1):257-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.09.041. Epub 2008 Nov 18.
To assess the effectiveness of interval debulking surgery (IDS) for patients with advanced stage epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC).
We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Medline, EMBASE, and reference lists for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of advanced stage EOC. The trials had to report survival of women who had primary surgery and had IDS performed between cycles of chemotherapy comparing to survival of women who had conventional treatment (primary debulking surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy). Two review authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. Meta-analysis of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) was performed using fixed effects models.
Three RCTs, involving 853 women of whom 781 were evaluated, met the inclusion criteria. OSs were substantial heterogeneity between trials (I(2)=58%). Subgroup analysis in two trials, wherein the primary surgery was not performed by the gynecologic oncologists, or was less extensive, showed benefit of IDS: hazard ratio=0.7 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.5 to 0.9, I(2)=0%). Substantial heterogeneity between two trials for PFS evaluating 702 women was also shown (I(2)=75%). Toxic reactions to chemotherapy were similar in both arms (RR=1.3, 95% CI: 0.4 to 3.6). Only one trial reported quality of life, which was generally similar in both treatment arms.
Our review could not conclude whether IDS would improve the survival of women with advanced EOC compared with conventional treatment. IDS appeared to yield benefit only in the patients whose primary surgery was not performed by expert surgeons.
评估间隔减瘤手术(IDS)对晚期上皮性卵巢癌(EOC)患者的有效性。
我们检索了Cochrane对照试验中央登记库、Medline、EMBASE以及参考文献列表,以查找晚期EOC的随机对照试验(RCT)。这些试验必须报告接受初次手术并在化疗周期之间进行IDS的女性的生存率,并与接受传统治疗(初次减瘤手术和辅助化疗)的女性的生存率进行比较。两位综述作者独立评估试验质量并提取数据。使用固定效应模型对总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)进行荟萃分析。
三项RCT符合纳入标准,涉及853名女性,其中781名接受了评估。试验之间的总生存期存在显著异质性(I² = 58%)。在两项试验的亚组分析中,初次手术并非由妇科肿瘤学家进行或范围较小,结果显示IDS有获益:风险比 = 0.7(95%置信区间[CI]:0.5至0.9,I² = 0%)。评估702名女性的两项试验在无进展生存期方面也显示出显著异质性(I² = 75%)。两组化疗的毒性反应相似(RR = 1.3,95% CI:0.4至3.6)。只有一项试验报告了生活质量,两个治疗组总体相似。
我们的综述无法得出与传统治疗相比,IDS是否能改善晚期EOC女性生存率的结论。IDS似乎仅在初次手术并非由专业外科医生进行的患者中产生获益。