Menzies Dick, Long Richard, Trajman Anete, Dion Marie-Josée, Yang Jae, Al Jahdali Hamdan, Memish Ziad, Khan Kamran, Gardam Michael, Hoeppner Vernon, Benedetti Andrea, Schwartzman Kevin
Montreal Chest Institute, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Ann Intern Med. 2008 Nov 18;149(10):689-97. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-149-10-200811180-00003.
Treatment of latent tuberculosis infection with isoniazid for 9 months is complicated by poor patient adherence and the need for close follow-up of side effects, especially hepatotoxicity. Shorter and safer regimens are needed.
To compare the frequency of adverse events and treatment completion in 2 treatment regimens for latent tuberculosis infection.
Multicenter, randomized, open-label trial.
Tuberculosis clinics located in university hospitals in Canada, Brazil, and Saudi Arabia.
847 patients without a contraindication for rifampin and requiring treatment for latent tuberculosis infection.
Four months of daily rifampin therapy or 9 months of daily isoniazid therapy.
Grade 3 to 4 drug-related adverse events resulting in drug discontinuation (primary outcome), and on-time treatment completion, grade 1 to 2 drug-related adverse events, and changes in liver enzymes and hematologic variables (secondary outcomes).
Seventeen of 422 participants who started isoniazid therapy developed grade 3 to 4 adverse events compared with 7 of 418 who started rifampin therapy (risk difference [rifampin minus isoniazid], -2.3% [95% CI, -5% to -0.1%]; P = 0.040). Grade 3 or 4 hepatitis occurred in 16 of 422 isoniazid recipients compared with 3 of 418 rifampin recipients (risk difference, -3.1% [CI, -5% to -1%]; P = 0.003). Grade 1 or 2 adverse events attributed to study drugs occurred with similar frequency. Asymptomatic reduction in platelet and leukocyte counts were more frequent in rifampin recipients. More patients completed rifampin treatment (78%) than isoniazid treatment (60%) (difference, 18% [CI, 12% to 24%]; P < 0.001]).
The study did not measure efficacy, and the open-label design may increase the chance of bias in ascertainment of adverse events.
Treatment of latent tuberculosis with 4 months of rifampin leads to fewer serious adverse events and better adherence than 9 months of isoniazid. These findings justify a large-scale trial to compare the efficacy of rifampin with that of isoniazid.
用异烟肼治疗潜伏性结核感染9个月存在患者依从性差以及需要密切随访副作用尤其是肝毒性的问题。需要更短且更安全的治疗方案。
比较两种潜伏性结核感染治疗方案的不良事件发生频率和治疗完成情况。
多中心、随机、开放标签试验。
位于加拿大、巴西和沙特阿拉伯大学医院的结核病诊所。
847例无利福平使用禁忌且需要治疗潜伏性结核感染的患者。
每日服用利福平4个月或每日服用异烟肼9个月。
导致停药的3至4级药物相关不良事件(主要结局)、按时完成治疗情况、1至2级药物相关不良事件以及肝酶和血液学变量的变化(次要结局)。
开始异烟肼治疗的422名参与者中有17人发生3至4级不良事件,而开始利福平治疗的418人中有7人发生(风险差异[利福平减去异烟肼],-2.3%[95%CI,-5%至-0.1%];P = 0.040)。422名异烟肼接受者中有16人发生3或4级肝炎,而418名利福平接受者中有3人发生(风险差异,-3.1%[CI,-5%至-1%];P = 0.003)。归因于研究药物的1或2级不良事件发生频率相似。利福平接受者中血小板和白细胞计数无症状性降低更为常见。完成利福平治疗的患者(78%)多于异烟肼治疗的患者(60%)(差异,18%[CI,12%至24%];P < 0.001)。
该研究未测量疗效,且开放标签设计可能增加不良事件确定过程中偏倚的可能性。
与9个月的异烟肼治疗相比,4个月的利福平治疗潜伏性结核导致的严重不良事件更少且依从性更好。这些发现为比较利福平和异烟肼疗效的大规模试验提供了依据。