Suppr超能文献

利福平与吡嗪酰胺对比异烟肼用于预防HIV感染者结核病:一项国际随机试验。艾滋病临床研究特里·贝恩社区项目、成人艾滋病临床试验组、泛美卫生组织及疾病控制与预防中心研究小组。

Rifampin and pyrazinamide vs isoniazid for prevention of tuberculosis in HIV-infected persons: an international randomized trial. Terry Beirn Community Programs for Clinical Research on AIDS, the Adult AIDS Clinical Trials Group, the Pan American Health Organization, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Study Group.

作者信息

Gordin F, Chaisson R E, Matts J P, Miller C, de Lourdes Garcia M, Hafner R, Valdespino J L, Coberly J, Schechter M, Klukowicz A J, Barry M A, O'Brien R J

机构信息

Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20422, USA.

出版信息

JAMA. 2000 Mar 15;283(11):1445-50. doi: 10.1001/jama.283.11.1445.

Abstract

CONTEXT

Because of problems with adherence, toxicity, and increasing resistance associated with 6- to 12-month isoniazid regimens, an alternative short-course tuberculosis preventive regimen is needed.

OBJECTIVE

To compare a 2-month regimen of daily rifampin and pyrazinamide with a 12-month regimen of daily isoniazid in preventing tuberculosis in persons with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection.

DESIGN

Randomized, open-label controlled trial conducted from September 1991 to May 1996, with follow-up through October 1997.

SETTING

Outpatient clinics in the United States, Mexico, Haiti, and Brazil.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 1583 HIV-positive persons aged 13 years or older with a positive tuberculin skin test result.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomized to isoniazid, 300 mg/d, with pyridoxine hydrochloride for 12 months (n = 792) or rifampin, 600 mg/d, and pyrazinamide, 20 mg/kg per day, for 2 months (n = 791).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary end point was culture-confirmed tuberculosis; secondary end points were proven or probable tuberculosis, adverse events, and death, compared by treatment group.

RESULTS

Of patients assigned to rifampin and pyrazinamide, 80% completed the regimen compared with 69% assigned to isoniazid (P<.001). After a mean follow-up of 37 months, 19 patients (2.4%) assigned to rifampin and pyrazinamide and 26 (3.3%) assigned to isoniazid developed confirmed tuberculosis at rates of 0.8 and 1.1 per 100 person-years, respectively (risk ratio, 0.72 [95% confidence interval, 0.40-1.31]; P = .28). In multivariate analysis, there were no significant differences in rates for confirmed or probable tuberculosis (P = .83), HIV progression and/or death (P = .09), or overall adverse events (P = .27), although drug discontinuation was slightly higher in the rifampin and pyrazinamide group (P = .01). Neither regimen appeared to lead to the development of drug-resistant tuberculosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that for preventing tuberculosis in HIV-infected patients, a daily 2-month regimen of rifampin and pyrazinamide is similar in safety and efficacy to a daily 12-month regimen of isoniazid. This shorter regimen offers practical advantages to both patients and tuberculosis control programs.

摘要

背景

由于6至12个月的异烟肼治疗方案存在依从性、毒性以及耐药性增加等问题,因此需要一种替代性的短程结核病预防方案。

目的

比较每日服用利福平与吡嗪酰胺的2个月疗程方案和每日服用异烟肼的12个月疗程方案在预防人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)感染患者发生结核病方面的效果。

设计

1991年9月至1996年5月进行的随机、开放标签对照试验,随访至1997年10月。

地点

美国、墨西哥、海地和巴西的门诊诊所。

参与者

总共1583名13岁及以上结核菌素皮肤试验结果呈阳性的HIV阳性患者。

干预措施

患者被随机分为两组,一组每日服用300毫克异烟肼加盐酸吡哆醇,疗程为12个月(n = 792);另一组每日服用600毫克利福平加每日每千克体重20毫克吡嗪酰胺,疗程为2个月(n = 791)。

主要观察指标

主要终点是培养确诊的结核病;次要终点是经证实或可能的结核病、不良事件和死亡,按治疗组进行比较。

结果

分配到利福平和吡嗪酰胺组的患者中,80%完成了疗程,而异烟肼组为69%(P<0.001)。平均随访37个月后,分配到利福平和吡嗪酰胺组的19名患者(2.4%)和分配到异烟肼组的26名患者(3.3%)发生了确诊结核病,发病率分别为每100人年0.8例和1.1例(风险比,0.72 [95%置信区间,0.40 - 1.31];P = 0.28)。在多变量分析中,确诊或可能的结核病发病率(P = 0.83)、HIV进展和/或死亡率(P = 0.09)或总体不良事件发生率(P = 0.27)均无显著差异,尽管利福平和吡嗪酰胺组的停药率略高(P = 0.01)。两种方案似乎均未导致耐药结核病的发生。

结论

我们的数据表明,对于预防HIV感染患者的结核病,每日服用利福平和吡嗪酰胺的2个月疗程方案在安全性和有效性方面与每日服用异烟肼的12个月疗程方案相似。这种较短的疗程方案对患者和结核病控制项目都具有实际优势。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验