Gordin F, Chaisson R E, Matts J P, Miller C, de Lourdes Garcia M, Hafner R, Valdespino J L, Coberly J, Schechter M, Klukowicz A J, Barry M A, O'Brien R J
Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20422, USA.
JAMA. 2000 Mar 15;283(11):1445-50. doi: 10.1001/jama.283.11.1445.
Because of problems with adherence, toxicity, and increasing resistance associated with 6- to 12-month isoniazid regimens, an alternative short-course tuberculosis preventive regimen is needed.
To compare a 2-month regimen of daily rifampin and pyrazinamide with a 12-month regimen of daily isoniazid in preventing tuberculosis in persons with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection.
Randomized, open-label controlled trial conducted from September 1991 to May 1996, with follow-up through October 1997.
Outpatient clinics in the United States, Mexico, Haiti, and Brazil.
A total of 1583 HIV-positive persons aged 13 years or older with a positive tuberculin skin test result.
Patients were randomized to isoniazid, 300 mg/d, with pyridoxine hydrochloride for 12 months (n = 792) or rifampin, 600 mg/d, and pyrazinamide, 20 mg/kg per day, for 2 months (n = 791).
The primary end point was culture-confirmed tuberculosis; secondary end points were proven or probable tuberculosis, adverse events, and death, compared by treatment group.
Of patients assigned to rifampin and pyrazinamide, 80% completed the regimen compared with 69% assigned to isoniazid (P<.001). After a mean follow-up of 37 months, 19 patients (2.4%) assigned to rifampin and pyrazinamide and 26 (3.3%) assigned to isoniazid developed confirmed tuberculosis at rates of 0.8 and 1.1 per 100 person-years, respectively (risk ratio, 0.72 [95% confidence interval, 0.40-1.31]; P = .28). In multivariate analysis, there were no significant differences in rates for confirmed or probable tuberculosis (P = .83), HIV progression and/or death (P = .09), or overall adverse events (P = .27), although drug discontinuation was slightly higher in the rifampin and pyrazinamide group (P = .01). Neither regimen appeared to lead to the development of drug-resistant tuberculosis.
Our data suggest that for preventing tuberculosis in HIV-infected patients, a daily 2-month regimen of rifampin and pyrazinamide is similar in safety and efficacy to a daily 12-month regimen of isoniazid. This shorter regimen offers practical advantages to both patients and tuberculosis control programs.
由于6至12个月的异烟肼治疗方案存在依从性、毒性以及耐药性增加等问题,因此需要一种替代性的短程结核病预防方案。
比较每日服用利福平与吡嗪酰胺的2个月疗程方案和每日服用异烟肼的12个月疗程方案在预防人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)感染患者发生结核病方面的效果。
1991年9月至1996年5月进行的随机、开放标签对照试验,随访至1997年10月。
美国、墨西哥、海地和巴西的门诊诊所。
总共1583名13岁及以上结核菌素皮肤试验结果呈阳性的HIV阳性患者。
患者被随机分为两组,一组每日服用300毫克异烟肼加盐酸吡哆醇,疗程为12个月(n = 792);另一组每日服用600毫克利福平加每日每千克体重20毫克吡嗪酰胺,疗程为2个月(n = 791)。
主要终点是培养确诊的结核病;次要终点是经证实或可能的结核病、不良事件和死亡,按治疗组进行比较。
分配到利福平和吡嗪酰胺组的患者中,80%完成了疗程,而异烟肼组为69%(P<0.001)。平均随访37个月后,分配到利福平和吡嗪酰胺组的19名患者(2.4%)和分配到异烟肼组的26名患者(3.3%)发生了确诊结核病,发病率分别为每100人年0.8例和1.1例(风险比,0.72 [95%置信区间,0.40 - 1.31];P = 0.28)。在多变量分析中,确诊或可能的结核病发病率(P = 0.83)、HIV进展和/或死亡率(P = 0.09)或总体不良事件发生率(P = 0.27)均无显著差异,尽管利福平和吡嗪酰胺组的停药率略高(P = 0.01)。两种方案似乎均未导致耐药结核病的发生。
我们的数据表明,对于预防HIV感染患者的结核病,每日服用利福平和吡嗪酰胺的2个月疗程方案在安全性和有效性方面与每日服用异烟肼的12个月疗程方案相似。这种较短的疗程方案对患者和结核病控制项目都具有实际优势。