Howard Ashley, Hoffman Janet, Sheth Anjly
Department of Pharmaceutical Services, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI 48073, USA.
Ann Pharmacother. 2008 Dec;42(12):1859-64. doi: 10.1345/aph.1L243. Epub 2008 Nov 18.
To review the current literature to determine the clinical application of therapeutic drug monitoring of voriconazole in the treatment of invasive aspergillosis (IA).
A MEDLINE search (1966-June 2008) was performed using the search terms voriconazole, aspergillosis, levels, monitoring, and serum concentration.
All pertinent English-language literature on voriconazole use in adults was included for evaluation.
IA is a serious fungal infection with a mortality rate of nearly 100% without adequate treatment; current therapeutic options are limited. A clinical trial comparing amphotericin B deoxycholate with voriconazole in treatment of IA found voriconazole to be superior. The use of voriconazole, however, is complicated due to its saturable metabolism, nonlinear kinetic profile, and drug interactions, which result in considerable interpatient variability in concentrations. Therefore, therapeutic monitoring of voriconazole trough concentrations may lead to improved patient outcomes. A recent prospective study on the use of voriconazole for treatment of invasive mycoses demonstrated that 46% of the patients had a lack of response when trough plasma concentrations were less than or equal to 1 microg/mL, compared with 12% of patients with trough concentrations greater than 1 microg/mL (p = 0.02). All patients with low trough concentrations who did not respond to voriconazole improved upon dose escalation. The upper limit of a therapeutic range is based on the presence of adverse events. The most common adverse effects associated with voriconazole are visual disturbances (21%) and elevations in liver transaminase levels (12.4%). Current literature suggests that a greater incidence of adverse effects may be associated with trough concentrations greater than 6 microg/mL.
A standardized therapeutic range for voriconazole has not been defined. Most available studies recommend trough concentrations of approximately 1-6 microg/mL. Prospective, randomized trials are needed to confirm the correlation between plasma voriconazole concentrations and clinical outcomes.
回顾当前文献,以确定伏立康唑治疗侵袭性曲霉病(IA)时治疗药物监测的临床应用。
使用检索词“伏立康唑”“曲霉病”“水平”“监测”和“血清浓度”进行了MEDLINE检索(1966年 - 2008年6月)。
纳入所有关于成人使用伏立康唑的相关英文文献进行评估。
IA是一种严重的真菌感染,若未得到充分治疗,死亡率接近100%;目前的治疗选择有限。一项比较两性霉素B脱氧胆酸盐与伏立康唑治疗IA的临床试验发现伏立康唑更具优势。然而,由于伏立康唑具有饱和代谢、非线性动力学特征以及药物相互作用,导致患者间血药浓度存在显著差异,其使用变得复杂。因此,监测伏立康唑谷浓度可能改善患者预后。最近一项关于伏立康唑治疗侵袭性真菌病的前瞻性研究表明,当谷血浆浓度小于或等于1μg/mL时,46%的患者无反应,而谷浓度大于1μg/mL的患者中这一比例为12%(p = 0.02)。所有谷浓度低且对伏立康唑无反应的患者在增加剂量后病情改善。治疗范围的上限基于不良事件的发生情况。与伏立康唑相关的最常见不良反应是视觉障碍(21%)和肝转氨酶水平升高(12.4%)。当前文献表明,谷浓度大于6μg/mL时,不良反应发生率可能更高。
尚未确定伏立康唑的标准化治疗范围。大多数现有研究推荐谷浓度约为1 - 6μg/mL。需要进行前瞻性随机试验以证实伏立康唑血浆浓度与临床结局之间的相关性。