• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Comparison of the genotyping results using DNA obtained from blood and saliva.使用从血液和唾液中获取的DNA进行基因分型结果的比较。
Psychiatr Genet. 2008 Dec;18(6):275-81. doi: 10.1097/YPG.0b013e3283060f81.
2
Assessing genetic polymorphisms using DNA extracted from cells present in saliva samples.评估使用唾液样本中存在的细胞提取的 DNA 的遗传多态性。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011 Dec 19;11:170. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-11-170.
3
Selection of a Noninvasive Source of Human DNA Envisaging Genotyping Assays in Epidemiological Studies: Urine or Saliva?在流行病学研究中设想基因分型检测时,选择一种非侵入性的人类 DNA 来源:尿液还是唾液?
J Biomol Tech. 2020 Apr;31(1):27-35. doi: 10.7171/jbt.20-3101-004.
4
Saliva samples are a viable alternative to blood samples as a source of DNA for high throughput genotyping.唾液样本是一种可行的替代血液样本的 DNA 来源,可用于高通量基因分型。
BMC Med Genomics. 2012 May 30;5:19. doi: 10.1186/1755-8794-5-19.
5
Saliva sampling in global clinical studies: the impact of low sampling volume on performance of DNA in downstream genotyping experiments.全球临床研究中的唾液采样:低采样量对下游基因分型实验中DNA性能的影响。
BMC Med Genomics. 2013 Jun 10;6:20. doi: 10.1186/1755-8794-6-20.
6
Genotyping performance between saliva and blood-derived genomic DNAs on the DMET array: a comparison.唾液和血液来源基因组 DNA 在 DMET 阵列上的基因分型性能比较:一项对比研究。
PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e33968. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033968. Epub 2012 Mar 20.
7
Impact of DNA source on genetic variant detection from human whole-genome sequencing data.DNA 来源对人类全基因组测序数据中遗传变异检测的影响。
J Med Genet. 2019 Dec;56(12):809-817. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2019-106281. Epub 2019 Sep 12.
8
Evaluation of the long-term storage stability of saliva as a source of human DNA.评估唾液作为人类 DNA 来源的长期储存稳定性。
Clin Oral Investig. 2013 Sep;17(7):1719-25. doi: 10.1007/s00784-012-0871-5. Epub 2012 Oct 27.
9
Quantity and quality assessment of DNA extracted from saliva and blood.从唾液和血液中提取的DNA的数量和质量评估。
Clin Lab. 2012;58(3-4):307-12.
10
Array-based whole-genome survey of dog saliva DNA yields high quality SNP data.基于阵列的全基因组犬唾液 DNA 调查产生高质量 SNP 数据。
PLoS One. 2010 May 25;5(5):e10809. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010809.

引用本文的文献

1
Influence of age, sex, and presence of cleft lip and palate on the quantity and quality of saliva-derived DNA.年龄、性别以及唇腭裂的存在对唾液来源DNA的数量和质量的影响。
J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2025 Mar-Apr;15(2):246-249. doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2025.01.030. Epub 2025 Feb 10.
2
RETRACTED: Genotyping strategies for tissues fixed with various embalming fluids for human identification, databasing, and traceability.撤回:用于人类身份识别、数据库建立和可追溯性的用各种防腐液固定的组织的基因分型策略。
J Forensic Sci. 2025 Jan;70(1):e1-e14. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.15414. Epub 2023 Oct 31.
3
Comparison of DNA extraction methods for COVID-19 host genetics studies.用于 COVID-19 宿主遗传学研究的 DNA 提取方法比较。
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 30;18(10):e0287551. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287551. eCollection 2023.
4
The Effectiveness of ddPCR for Detection of Point Mutations in Poor-Quality Saliva Samples.数字滴液聚合酶链反应检测低质量唾液样本中基因突变的有效性
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 May 20;10(5):947. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10050947.
5
Additive and Interactive Genetically Contextual Effects of HbA1c on cg19693031 Methylation in Type 2 Diabetes.HbA1c 对 2 型糖尿病患者 cg19693031 甲基化的相加和交互遗传影响。
Genes (Basel). 2022 Apr 13;13(4):683. doi: 10.3390/genes13040683.
6
Association of COL1A2 (PvuII) gene polymorphism with risk and severity of dental fluorosis - A case control study.COL1A2(PvuII)基因多态性与氟斑牙风险及严重程度的关联——一项病例对照研究
Saudi Dent J. 2019 Oct;31(4):463-468. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2019.05.004. Epub 2019 May 22.
7
Saliva DNA Methylation Detects Nascent Smoking in Adolescents.唾液DNA甲基化检测青少年中的初吸情况。
J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2019 Aug;29(7):535-544. doi: 10.1089/cap.2018.0176. Epub 2019 Jun 10.
8
DNA methylation analysis from saliva samples for epidemiological studies.唾液样本中的 DNA 甲基化分析用于流行病学研究。
Epigenetics. 2018;13(4):352-362. doi: 10.1080/15592294.2018.1461295. Epub 2018 Aug 1.
9
High Resolution Melting (HRM) for High-Throughput Genotyping-Limitations and Caveats in Practical Case Studies.高分辨率熔解(HRM)高通量基因分型-实际案例研究中的局限性和注意事项。
Int J Mol Sci. 2017 Nov 3;18(11):2316. doi: 10.3390/ijms18112316.
10
Rapid and Reliable Detection of Nonsyndromic Hearing Loss Mutations by Multicolor Melting Curve Analysis.多色熔解曲线分析快速可靠地检测非综合征型听力损失突变。
Sci Rep. 2017 Feb 22;7:42894. doi: 10.1038/srep42894.

本文引用的文献

1
Quality and quantity of saliva DNA obtained from the self-administrated oragene method--a pilot study on the cohort of Swedish men.通过自我采集的Oragene方法获得的唾液DNA的质量和数量——一项针对瑞典男性队列的初步研究
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006 Sep;15(9):1742-5. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0706.
2
No association of the C677T methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase polymorphism with schizophrenia.C677T亚甲基四氢叶酸还原酶基因多态性与精神分裂症无关联。
Psychiatr Genet. 2006 Oct;16(5):221-3. doi: 10.1097/01.ypg.0000242192.28526.fa.
3
Specific and quantitative detection of human polyomaviruses BKV, JCV, and SV40 by real time PCR.通过实时聚合酶链反应对人多瘤病毒BKV、JCV和SV40进行特异性定量检测。
J Clin Virol. 2005 Sep;34(1):52-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2004.12.018.
4
The Strong African American Families Program: translating research into prevention programming.强大非裔美国家庭项目:将研究转化为预防方案
Child Dev. 2004 May-Jun;75(3):900-17. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00713.x.
5
MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry-based SNP genotyping.基于基质辅助激光解吸电离飞行时间质谱的单核苷酸多态性基因分型
Pharmacogenomics. 2002 Jul;3(4):537-48. doi: 10.1517/14622416.3.4.537.
6
DNA banking for epidemiologic studies: a review of current practices.用于流行病学研究的DNA库:当前实践综述
Epidemiology. 2002 May;13(3):246-54. doi: 10.1097/00001648-200205000-00003.
7
Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method.使用实时定量PCR和2(-ΔΔC(T))方法分析相对基因表达数据。
Methods. 2001 Dec;25(4):402-8. doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262.
8
Collection of genomic DNA from adults in epidemiological studies by buccal cytobrush and mouthwash.在流行病学研究中,通过口腔细胞刷和漱口水从成年人中收集基因组DNA。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2001 Jun;10(6):687-96.
9
Reducing the pain of venipuncture.减轻静脉穿刺的疼痛。
J Perianesth Nurs. 1999 Apr;14(2):95-101, 112. doi: 10.1016/s1089-9472(99)80024-0.
10
PicoGreen quantitation of DNA: effective evaluation of samples pre- or post-PCR.DNA的PicoGreen定量分析:PCR前后样本的有效评估
Nucleic Acids Res. 1996 Jul 1;24(13):2623-5. doi: 10.1093/nar/24.13.2623.

使用从血液和唾液中获取的DNA进行基因分型结果的比较。

Comparison of the genotyping results using DNA obtained from blood and saliva.

作者信息

Philibert Robert A, Zadorozhnyaya Olga, Beach Steven R H, Brody Gene H

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, 52242-1000, USA.

出版信息

Psychiatr Genet. 2008 Dec;18(6):275-81. doi: 10.1097/YPG.0b013e3283060f81.

DOI:10.1097/YPG.0b013e3283060f81
PMID:19018232
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2648613/
Abstract

AIM

Traditionally, large scale genotyping projects have used DNA derived from whole-blood or lymphoblast cell lines. But over the past several years, a number of investigators have begun to use DNA prepared from saliva for genotyping studies, particularly for use in behavioral genetic studies. However, the comparability of DNA from these two sources has not been rigorously analyzed by unbiased sources.

OBJECTIVE

In this communication, we compare the single nucleotide polymorphism genotyping results from DNA derived from whole-blood samples obtained from 474 participants from the Iowa Adoption Studies with that of saliva samples prepared from 555 members of the Strong African-American Families project.

RESULTS

We found that DNA prepared from whole-blood performed significantly better than that prepared from saliva. Genotyping success was significantly associated with the concentration of human DNA in the saliva sample as determined by quantitative PCR, but not with the total amount of DNA as determined by UV spectroscopy.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that investigators contemplating the choice of source materials of DNA for genotyping studies will need to balance the ease and economy of saliva-based DNA collection methods with the higher yields and rates of genotyping calls associated with DNA prepared from whole-blood.

摘要

目的

传统上,大规模基因分型项目使用来自全血或淋巴母细胞系的DNA。但在过去几年中,一些研究人员已开始使用从唾液中提取的DNA进行基因分型研究,特别是用于行为遗传学研究。然而,来自这两种来源的DNA的可比性尚未得到无偏倚来源的严格分析。

目的

在本交流中,我们比较了来自爱荷华收养研究的474名参与者全血样本的DNA与来自强大非裔美国家庭项目的555名成员唾液样本的单核苷酸多态性基因分型结果。

结果

我们发现,从全血中提取的DNA表现明显优于从唾液中提取的DNA。基因分型成功率与通过定量PCR测定的唾液样本中人类DNA浓度显著相关,但与通过紫外光谱测定的DNA总量无关。

结论

我们得出结论,考虑为基因分型研究选择DNA来源材料的研究人员需要在基于唾液的DNA收集方法的简便性和经济性与从全血中提取的DNA更高的产量和基因分型检出率之间进行权衡。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/27e2/2648613/1c589e0b2ccc/nihms89985f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/27e2/2648613/40b686162fe7/nihms89985f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/27e2/2648613/0cf61c52b229/nihms89985f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/27e2/2648613/1c589e0b2ccc/nihms89985f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/27e2/2648613/40b686162fe7/nihms89985f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/27e2/2648613/0cf61c52b229/nihms89985f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/27e2/2648613/1c589e0b2ccc/nihms89985f3.jpg