Johnson Daniel C, Wade Michael G
School of Kinesiology and Center for Cognitive Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2009 May;51(5):397-403. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2008.03174.x. Epub 2009 Nov 19.
In three separate manipulations, a group of children at risk for developmental coordination disorder (DCD; five males, seven females; mean age 11y 6mo [SD 6.8mo] who were at or below the 15th centile on the Movement ABC) and a group of typically developing children (TDC; seven males, five females; mean age 11y 3mo [SD 6.8mo]) judged the limit of their standing horizontal reach (HRmax) under two conditions in which actual HRmax differed. The manipulations were: (1) one-hand versus two-hand reach; and (2) standard versus short effective foot-length; and (3) rigid versus compliant support surface. For the foot-length and support surface manipulations (but not for the hand manipulation), children correctly judged that their actual HRmax differed in the two conditions (p<.05). On all three manipulations, TDC made significantly larger adjustments in their judgements than did children at risk for DCD (p<0.05). The TDC group adjusted their judgements in the appropriate direction on all three manipulations, whereas the DCD group adjusted in the appropriate direction for the foot-length manipulation only. The results suggest that children at risk for DCD are less adept at detecting changes in the limits of their action capabilities.
在三次独立的操作中,一组有发育性协调障碍风险(DCD)的儿童(5名男性,7名女性;平均年龄11岁6个月[标准差6.8个月],其在动作ABC测试中处于或低于第15百分位)和一组发育正常的儿童(TDC;7名男性,5名女性;平均年龄11岁3个月[标准差6.8个月])在两种实际最大水平伸展距离(HRmax)不同的条件下判断自己的站立水平伸展极限。操作内容包括:(1)单手伸展与双手伸展;(2)标准有效脚长与短有效脚长;(3)刚性支撑面与柔性支撑面。对于脚长和支撑面操作(但不包括手部操作),儿童正确判断出他们在两种条件下的实际HRmax不同(p<0.05)。在所有三次操作中,TDC组在判断上的调整幅度显著大于有DCD风险的儿童(p<0.05)。TDC组在所有三次操作中都朝着正确方向调整了他们的判断,而DCD组仅在脚长操作中朝着正确方向进行了调整。结果表明,有DCD风险的儿童在检测自身动作能力极限变化方面不太熟练。