• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在全科医疗中提高慢性收缩性心力衰竭药物治疗的指南依从性——一项临床实践指南实施的整群随机对照试验结果

Improved guideline adherence to pharmacotherapy of chronic systolic heart failure in general practice--results from a cluster-randomized controlled trial of implementation of a clinical practice guideline.

作者信息

Peters-Klimm Frank, Müller-Tasch Thomas, Remppis Andrew, Szecsenyi Joachim, Schellberg Dieter

机构信息

Department of Genral Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Germany.

出版信息

J Eval Clin Pract. 2008 Oct;14(5):823-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2008.01060.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2008.01060.x
PMID:19018915
Abstract

RATIONALE AND AIMS

Clinical practice guidelines (CPG) reflect the evidence of effective pharmacotherapy of chronic (systolic) heart failure (CHF) which needs to be implemented. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of a new, multifaceted intervention (educational train-the-trainer course plus pharmacotherapy feedback = TTT) compared with standard education on guideline adherence (GA) in general practice.

METHOD

Thirty-seven participating general practitioners (GPs) were randomized (18 vs. 19) and included 168 patients with ascertained symptomatic CHF [New York Heart Association (NYHA) II-IV]. Groups received CPG, the TTT intervention consisted of four interactive educational meetings and a pharmacotherapy feedback, while the control group received a usual lecture (Standard). Outcome measure was GA assessed by prescription rates and target dosing of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors (ACE-I) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB), beta-blockers (BB) and aldosterone antagonists (AA) at baseline and 7-month follow-up. Group comparisons at follow-up were adjusted to GA, sex, age and NYHA stage at baseline.

RESULTS

Prescription rates at baseline (n = 168) were high (ACE-I/ARB 90, BB 79 and AA 29%) in both groups. At follow up (n = 146), TTT improved compared with Standard regarding AA (43% vs. 23%, P = 0.04) and the rates of reached target doses of ACE-I/ARB (28% vs. 15%, P = 0.04). TTT group achieved significantly higher mean percentages of daily target dose (52% vs. 42%, mean difference 10.3%, 95% CI 0.84-19.8, P = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

Despite of pre-existing high GA in both groups and an active control group, the multifaceted intervention was effective in quality of care measured by GA. Further research is needed on the choice of interventions in different provider populations.

摘要

原理与目的

临床实践指南(CPG)反映了慢性(收缩性)心力衰竭(CHF)有效药物治疗的证据,需要予以实施。本研究旨在评估一种新的多方面干预措施(教育培训师课程加药物治疗反馈 = TTT)与标准教育相比,对全科医疗中指南依从性(GA)的影响。

方法

37名参与的全科医生(GP)被随机分组(18名对19名),纳入168例确诊为有症状CHF的患者[纽约心脏协会(NYHA)II-IV级]。两组均接受CPG,TTT干预包括四次互动教育会议和一次药物治疗反馈,而对照组接受常规讲座(标准组)。结局指标是通过基线和7个月随访时血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)抑制剂(ACE-I)或血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB)、β受体阻滞剂(BB)和醛固酮拮抗剂(AA)的处方率和目标剂量来评估GA。随访时的组间比较根据基线时的GA、性别、年龄和NYHA分级进行了调整。

结果

两组在基线时(n = 168)的处方率都很高(ACE-I/ARB为90%,BB为79%,AA为29%)。在随访时(n = 146),与标准组相比,TTT组在AA方面有所改善(43%对23%,P = 0.04),以及ACE-I/ARB达到目标剂量的比例(28%对15%,P = 0.04)。TTT组实现的每日目标剂量平均百分比显著更高(52%对42%,平均差异10.3%,95%CI 0.84 - 19.8,P = 0.03)。

结论

尽管两组以及积极对照组中预先存在较高的GA,但多方面干预在以GA衡量的医疗质量方面是有效的。需要对不同医疗服务提供者群体的干预措施选择进行进一步研究。

相似文献

1
Improved guideline adherence to pharmacotherapy of chronic systolic heart failure in general practice--results from a cluster-randomized controlled trial of implementation of a clinical practice guideline.在全科医疗中提高慢性收缩性心力衰竭药物治疗的指南依从性——一项临床实践指南实施的整群随机对照试验结果
J Eval Clin Pract. 2008 Oct;14(5):823-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2008.01060.x.
2
The impact of patient-specific quality-of-care report cards on guideline adherence in heart failure.特定患者的医疗质量报告卡对心力衰竭指南依从性的影响。
Am Heart J. 2007 Dec;154(6):1174-83. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2007.08.007. Epub 2007 Oct 24.
3
Underuse of ACE inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers in elderly patients with diabetes.老年糖尿病患者中血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂和血管紧张素II受体阻滞剂的使用不足。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2005 Dec;46(6):1080-7. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2005.08.018.
4
Guideline adherence for pharmacotherapy of chronic systolic heart failure in general practice: a closer look on evidence-based therapy.基层医疗中慢性收缩性心力衰竭药物治疗的指南遵循情况:深入探讨循证治疗
Clin Res Cardiol. 2008 Apr;97(4):244-52. doi: 10.1007/s00392-007-0617-6. Epub 2007 Nov 28.
5
Adherence to guidelines is a predictor of outcome in chronic heart failure: the MAHLER survey.遵循指南是慢性心力衰竭预后的一个预测指标:MAHLER调查。
Eur Heart J. 2005 Aug;26(16):1653-9. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi251. Epub 2005 Apr 12.
6
An evaluation of educational outreach to improve evidence-based prescribing in Medicaid: a cautionary tale.评估医疗补助计划中为改善循证处方而开展的教育推广活动:一则警示故事。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2008 Oct;14(5):854-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2008.01035.x.
7
The AHCPR guidelines on heart failure: comparison of a family medicine and an internal medicine practice with the guidelines and an educational intervention to modify behavior.美国卫生保健政策与研究署(AHCPR)心力衰竭指南:家庭医学与内科实践与指南的比较以及改变行为的教育干预措施。
Clin Perform Qual Health Care. 1996 Oct-Dec;4(4):179-85.
8
Adherence to guidelines for patients hospitalized with heart failure: a nationwide survey.心力衰竭住院患者对指南的遵循情况:一项全国性调查。
Isr Med Assoc J. 2006 Dec;8(12):875-9.
9
Improving guideline adherence: a randomized trial evaluating strategies to increase beta-blocker use in heart failure.提高指南依从性:一项评估增加心力衰竭患者β受体阻滞剂使用策略的随机试验。
Circulation. 2003 Jun 10;107(22):2799-804. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000070952.08969.5B. Epub 2003 May 19.
10
Academic detailing to improve laboratory testing among outpatient medication users.学术推广以改善门诊用药患者的实验室检测情况。
Med Care. 2007 Oct;45(10):966-72. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3180546856.

引用本文的文献

1
Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice.审核与反馈:对专业实践的影响
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 25;3(3):CD000259. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000259.pub4.
2
rimary care dherence o eart ailure guidelines iagnosis, valuation and outine management (PATHFINDER): a randomised controlled trial protocol.基层医疗对心力衰竭指南的依从性:诊断、评估和概述管理(PATHFINDER):一项随机对照试验方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Mar 27;13(3):e063656. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063656.
3
Mixed-methods evaluation of a multifaceted heart failure intervention in general practice: the OSCAR-HF pilot study.
综合实践中多方面心力衰竭干预措施的混合方法评价:OSCAR-HF 试点研究。
ESC Heart Fail. 2023 Apr;10(2):907-916. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.14251. Epub 2022 Dec 3.
4
Quality assessment of Japanese clinical practice guidelines including recommendations for acupuncture.日本临床实践指南的质量评估,包括针灸相关建议。
Integr Med Res. 2022 Sep;11(3):100838. doi: 10.1016/j.imr.2022.100838. Epub 2022 Feb 11.
5
Training general practitioners to improve evidence-based drug treatment of patients with heart failure: a cluster randomised controlled trial.培训全科医生以改善心力衰竭患者的循证药物治疗:一项整群随机对照试验。
Neth Heart J. 2020 Nov;28(11):604-612. doi: 10.1007/s12471-020-01487-x.
6
Effectiveness of implementation interventions in improving physician adherence to guideline recommendations in heart failure: a systematic review.实施干预措施在提高医生对心力衰竭指南建议的依从性方面的有效性:一项系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2018 Mar 6;8(3):e017765. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017765.
7
Cardiovascular care guideline implementation in community health centers in Oregon: a mixed-methods analysis of real-world barriers and challenges.俄勒冈州社区卫生中心心血管护理指南的实施:对现实世界中的障碍和挑战的混合方法分析
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Apr 5;17(1):253. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2194-3.
8
Overdiagnosis of heart failure in primary care: a cross-sectional study.基层医疗中心力衰竭的过度诊断:一项横断面研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2016 Aug;66(649):e587-92. doi: 10.3399/bjgp16X685705. Epub 2016 Jun 6.
9
Effectiveness of implementation strategies in improving physician adherence to guideline recommendations in heart failure: a systematic review protocol.改善医生对心力衰竭指南建议依从性的实施策略的有效性:一项系统评价方案
BMJ Open. 2016 Mar 31;6(3):e009364. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009364.
10
Interventions to improve adherence to cardiovascular disease guidelines: a systematic review.改善心血管疾病指南依从性的干预措施:一项系统评价。
BMC Fam Pract. 2015 Oct 22;16:147. doi: 10.1186/s12875-015-0341-7.