Zhuang H, Savage E M
Quality and Safety Assessment Research Unit USDA, Agricultural Research Service, Russell Research Center, P.O. Box 5677, Athens, GA 30604-5677, USA.
J Food Sci. 2008 Oct;73(8):S424-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2008.00931.x.
Quality assessment results of cooked meat can be significantly affected by sample preparation with different cooking techniques. A combi oven is a relatively new cooking technique in the U.S. market. However, there was a lack of published data about its effect on quality measurements of chicken meat. Broiler breast fillets deboned at 24-h postmortem were cooked with one of the 3 methods to the core temperature of 80 degrees C. Cooking methods were evaluated based on cooking operation requirements, sensory profiles, Warner-Bratzler (WB) shear and cooking loss. Our results show that the average cooking time for the combi oven was 17 min compared with 31 min for the commercial oven method and 16 min for the hot water method. The combi oven did not result in a significant difference in the WB shear force values, although the cooking loss of the combi oven samples was significantly lower than the commercial oven and hot water samples. Sensory profiles of the combi oven samples did not significantly differ from those of the commercial oven and hot water samples. These results demonstrate that combi oven cooking did not significantly affect sensory profiles and WB shear force measurements of chicken breast muscle compared to the other 2 cooking methods. The combi oven method appears to be an acceptable alternative for preparing chicken breast fillets in a quality assessment.
熟肉的质量评估结果会受到采用不同烹饪技术进行样品制备的显著影响。组合烤箱是美国市场上一种相对较新的烹饪技术。然而,关于其对鸡肉质量测量影响的已发表数据却很缺乏。在宰后24小时去骨的肉鸡胸肉柳采用三种方法之一烹饪至中心温度80摄氏度。根据烹饪操作要求、感官特征、沃纳-布拉茨勒(WB)剪切力和烹饪损失对烹饪方法进行评估。我们的结果表明,组合烤箱的平均烹饪时间为17分钟,相比之下,商业烤箱法为31分钟,热水法为16分钟。组合烤箱的WB剪切力值没有显著差异,尽管组合烤箱样品的烹饪损失显著低于商业烤箱和热水样品。组合烤箱样品的感官特征与商业烤箱和热水样品没有显著差异。这些结果表明,与其他两种烹饪方法相比,组合烤箱烹饪对鸡胸肉的感官特征和WB剪切力测量没有显著影响。在质量评估中,组合烤箱法似乎是制备肉鸡胸肉柳的一种可接受的替代方法。