van Raaij Tom M, Brouwer Reinoud W, Reijman Max, Bierma-Zeinstra Sita M A, Verhaar Jan A N
Department of Orthopaedics, HS-105, Erasmus Medical Center, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Knee. 2009 Mar;16(2):109-11. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2008.10.003. Epub 2008 Nov 18.
Surgical therapeutic procedures such as knee osteotomy and knee replacement depend on proper knee alignment assessment. The aim of this study was to evaluate if femorotibial (FT) measurement on short knee films may be used in clinical settings. The study population comprised 68 patients with symptomatic medial compartmental knee osteoarthritis. We measured the FT angle with the use of mid-diaphyseal lines (FTa), and the knee joint centre (FTb) to determine anatomical knee alignment on a short knee image. Then, the accuracy of alignment was compared to the gold standard Hip-Knee-Ankle (HKA) angle on a full-limb view. FTa angle assessment correlated well (r=0.65) with the HKA angle. However, this method showed poor inter-observer agreement (ICC=0.37). 3% of patients were incorrectly classified as having valgus alignment. Good intra- and inter-observer agreements were observed for FTb angle measurement (ICC=0.89 and 0.79; respectively). But correlation between HKA and FTb angles was low (r=0.34). 15% of patients were incorrectly classified as having valgus alignment. Short knee images cannot substitute whole leg views when accurate assessment of knee alignment is essential.
诸如膝关节截骨术和膝关节置换术等外科治疗程序依赖于正确的膝关节对线评估。本研究的目的是评估在临床环境中短膝关节X线片上的股胫(FT)测量是否可用。研究人群包括68例有症状的内侧间室膝关节骨关节炎患者。我们使用骨干中线(FTa)和膝关节中心(FTb)测量FT角,以确定短膝关节图像上的解剖学膝关节对线。然后,将对线的准确性与全下肢视图上的金标准髋-膝-踝(HKA)角进行比较。FTa角评估与HKA角相关性良好(r=0.65)。然而,这种方法显示观察者间一致性较差(ICC=0.37)。3%的患者被错误分类为外翻对线。FTb角测量观察到良好的观察者内和观察者间一致性(ICC分别为0.89和0.79)。但HKA角与FTb角之间的相关性较低(r=0.34)。15%的患者被错误分类为外翻对线。当准确评估膝关节对线至关重要时,短膝关节图像不能替代全腿视图。