Marx Felix G
Department of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1RJ, UK.
Proc Biol Sci. 2009 Mar 7;276(1658):887-92. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2008.1473.
The validity of biological explanations of patterns of palaeodiversity has been called into question owing to an apparent correlation of diversity with the amount of sedimentary rock preserved. However, this claim has largely been based on comprehensive estimates of global marine Phanerozoic diversity, thus raising the question of whether a similar bias applies to the records of smaller, well-defined taxonomic groups. Here, new data on European Caenozoic marine sedimentary rock outcrop area are presented and compared with European occurrences of three groups of marine mammals (cetaceans, pinnipedimorphs and sirenians). Limited evidence was found for a correlation of outcrop area with marine mammal palaeodiversity. In addition, similar patterns were identified in the cetacean and pinnipedimorph diversity data. This may point to the preservation of a genuine biological signal not overwhelmed by geological biases in the marine mammal diversity data, and opens the door to further analyses of both marine mammal evolution and geological bias in other small and well-defined groups of taxa.
由于多样性与保存的沉积岩数量之间存在明显的相关性,古生物多样性模式的生物学解释的有效性受到了质疑。然而,这一说法主要基于对全球显生宙海洋生物多样性的综合估计,因此引发了一个问题,即类似的偏差是否适用于较小的、定义明确的分类群记录。本文展示了欧洲新生代海洋沉积岩露头面积的新数据,并将其与欧洲三类海洋哺乳动物(鲸类、鳍脚类和海牛类)的出现情况进行了比较。发现露头面积与海洋哺乳动物古生物多样性之间存在相关性的证据有限。此外,在鲸类和鳍脚类多样性数据中也发现了类似的模式。这可能表明在海洋哺乳动物多样性数据中保存了一个未被地质偏差掩盖的真实生物信号,并为进一步分析海洋哺乳动物进化以及其他小型且定义明确的分类群中的地质偏差打开了大门。