• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

雌性配偶偏好的强度会随着捕食风险的增加而增强。

The strength of a female mate preference increases with predation risk.

作者信息

Kim Tae Won, Christy John H, Dennenmoser Stefan, Choe Jae C

机构信息

School of Biological Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-747, Korea.

出版信息

Proc Biol Sci. 2009 Feb 22;276(1657):775-80. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2008.1070.

DOI:10.1098/rspb.2008.1070
PMID:19019792
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2660929/
Abstract

When females search for mates and their perceived risk of predation increases, they less often express preferences for males that use conspicuous courtship signals, relaxing sexual selection on production of these signals. Here, we report an apparent exception to this general pattern. Courting male fiddler crabs Uca beebei sometimes build pillars of mud at the openings to their burrows in which crabs mate. Females visit several males before they choose a mate by staying and breeding in their burrows, and they preferentially visit males with pillars. Previous studies suggested that this preference is based on a visual orientation behaviour that may reduce females' risk of predation while searching for a mate. We tested this idea by determining whether the female preference for males with pillars increases with perceived predation risk. We attracted avian predators to where crabs were courting and measured the rates that sexually receptive females visited courting males with and without mud pillars. Under elevated risk, females continued to search for mates and they showed a stronger relative preference for males with pillars. Thus, when predation risk is high, females may continue to express preferences that are under natural selection because they help females avoid predation, strengthening sexual selection for use of the preferred signal.

摘要

当雌性寻找配偶且其感知到的被捕食风险增加时,它们对使用显眼求偶信号的雄性的偏好就会降低,从而放松了对这些信号产生的性选择。在此,我们报告了这一普遍模式的一个明显例外。求偶的北方大弹涂鱼(Uca beebei)有时会在其洞穴开口处建造泥柱,螃蟹在这些洞穴中交配。雌性在选择配偶并在其洞穴中停留和繁殖之前会拜访多个雄性,并且它们优先拜访有泥柱的雄性。先前的研究表明,这种偏好基于一种视觉定向行为,这种行为可能会降低雌性在寻找配偶时被捕食的风险。我们通过确定雌性对有泥柱雄性的偏好是否会随着感知到的捕食风险增加来检验这一想法。我们将鸟类捕食者吸引到螃蟹求偶的地方,并测量了处于性接受期的雌性拜访有泥柱和没有泥柱的求偶雄性的频率。在风险增加的情况下,雌性继续寻找配偶,并且它们对有泥柱雄性表现出更强的相对偏好。因此,当捕食风险很高时,雌性可能会继续表达受到自然选择的偏好,因为这些偏好有助于雌性避免被捕食,从而加强了对使用首选信号的性选择。

相似文献

1
The strength of a female mate preference increases with predation risk.雌性配偶偏好的强度会随着捕食风险的增加而增强。
Proc Biol Sci. 2009 Feb 22;276(1657):775-80. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2008.1070.
2
Is female preference for large sexual ornaments due to a bias to escape predation risk?女性是否偏爱大的性装饰物是由于逃避捕食风险的偏见?
BMC Evol Biol. 2012 Mar 13;12:33. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-12-33.
3
A preference for a sexual signal keeps females safe.雌性偏好性信号以确保安全。
PLoS One. 2007 May 9;2(5):e422. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000422.
4
Choosing a mate in a high predation environment: Female preference in the fiddler crab .在高捕食风险环境中选择配偶:招潮蟹的雌性偏好
Ecol Evol. 2016 Sep 27;6(20):7443-7450. doi: 10.1002/ece3.2510. eCollection 2016 Oct.
5
Density affects mating mode and large male mating advantage in a fiddler crab.密度会影响招潮蟹的交配模式和大♂♂优势。
Oecologia. 2010 Dec;164(4):931-41. doi: 10.1007/s00442-010-1801-3. Epub 2010 Oct 8.
6
The vibrational signals that male fiddler crabs (Uca lactea) use to attract females into their burrows.雄性招潮蟹(Uca lactea)用来吸引雌性进入其洞穴的振动信号。
Naturwissenschaften. 2016 Jun;103(5-6):49. doi: 10.1007/s00114-016-1371-2. Epub 2016 May 30.
7
Eavesdropping in crabs: an agency for lady detection.螃蟹偷听:一种探测雌性的机制。
Biol Lett. 2010 Dec 23;6(6):755-7. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2010.0384. Epub 2010 Jun 2.
8
Sexual selection and the physiological consequences of habitat choice by a fiddler crab.性选择与招潮蟹栖息地选择的生理后果
Oecologia. 2014 Sep;176(1):25-34. doi: 10.1007/s00442-014-3002-y. Epub 2014 Jul 6.
9
Mate choice and the operational sex ratio: an experimental test with robotic crabs.配偶选择与两性 operational 比例:对机器蟹的一项实验测试
J Evol Biol. 2016 Jul;29(7):1455-61. doi: 10.1111/jeb.12884. Epub 2016 May 8.
10
Ladies First: Coerced Mating in a Fiddler Crab.女士优先:招潮蟹中的强制交配
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 15;11(6):e0155707. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155707. eCollection 2016.

引用本文的文献

1
Eat Better to Look Better: The Relationship between Food Availability, UV Brightness of the Major Claw, and Mating Success of the Fiddler Crab .吃得更好,看起来更美:食物可获得性、大螯紫外线亮度与招潮蟹交配成功率之间的关系
Zool Stud. 2022 Sep 12;61:e43. doi: 10.6620/ZS.2022.61-43. eCollection 2022.
2
A comprehensive overview of the effects of urbanisation on sexual selection and sexual traits.城市化对性选择和性特征影响的综合概述。
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2022 Aug;97(4):1325-1345. doi: 10.1111/brv.12845. Epub 2022 Mar 9.
3
Choosing a mate in a high predation environment: Female preference in the fiddler crab .在高捕食风险环境中选择配偶:招潮蟹的雌性偏好
Ecol Evol. 2016 Sep 27;6(20):7443-7450. doi: 10.1002/ece3.2510. eCollection 2016 Oct.
4
Monoaminergic integration of diet and social signals in the brains of juvenile spadefoot toads.幼年锄足蟾大脑中饮食与社交信号的单胺能整合
J Exp Biol. 2017 Sep 1;220(Pt 17):3135-3141. doi: 10.1242/jeb.159954. Epub 2017 Jun 28.
5
Not what it looks like: mate-searching behaviour, mate preferences and clutch production in wandering and territory-holding female fiddler crabs.并非表面所见:游荡型和领地型雌性招潮蟹的求偶行为、配偶偏好及抱卵量
R Soc Open Sci. 2016 Aug 24;3(8):160339. doi: 10.1098/rsos.160339. eCollection 2016 Aug.
6
Why do ovigerous females approach courting males? Female preferences and sensory biases in a fiddler crab.抱卵雌蟹为何接近求偶雄蟹?招潮蟹的雌性偏好与感官偏好
Ecol Evol. 2016 Jul 10;6(15):5473-8. doi: 10.1002/ece3.2307. eCollection 2016 Aug.
7
A conceptual review of mate choice: stochastic demography, within-sex phenotypic plasticity, and individual flexibility.配偶选择的概念性综述:随机人口统计学、性别内表型可塑性和个体灵活性。
Ecol Evol. 2016 Jun 8;6(14):4607-42. doi: 10.1002/ece3.2197. eCollection 2016 Jul.
8
Is female preference for large sexual ornaments due to a bias to escape predation risk?女性是否偏爱大的性装饰物是由于逃避捕食风险的偏见?
BMC Evol Biol. 2012 Mar 13;12:33. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-12-33.
9
Predator-induced changes of female mating preferences: innate and experiential effects.捕食者诱导的雌性交配偏好变化:先天和经验的影响。
BMC Evol Biol. 2011 Jul 4;11:190. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-11-190.
10
Male water striders attract predators to intimidate females into copulation.雄水黾会吸引捕食者来恐吓雌水黾进行交配。
Nat Commun. 2010 Aug 10;1(5):52. doi: 10.1038/ncomms1051.

本文引用的文献

1
Sensory ecology, receiver biases and sexual selection.感觉生态学、接收者偏见和性选择。
Trends Ecol Evol. 1998 Oct 1;13(10):415-20. doi: 10.1016/s0169-5347(98)01471-2.
2
Multiple-trait coevolution and environmental gradients in guppies.多种特征协同进化与食蚊鱼的环境梯度。
Trends Ecol Evol. 1995 Jan;10(1):22-9. doi: 10.1016/s0169-5347(00)88956-9.
3
Predation risk as a cost of reproduction.捕食风险作为繁殖的代价。
Trends Ecol Evol. 1991 Jun;6(6):183-6. doi: 10.1016/0169-5347(91)90210-O.
4
A preference for a sexual signal keeps females safe.雌性偏好性信号以确保安全。
PLoS One. 2007 May 9;2(5):e422. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000422.
5
Deception and the origin of honest signals.欺骗与诚实信号的起源
Trends Ecol Evol. 2005 Oct;20(10):521-3. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2005.08.004. Epub 2005 Aug 24.
6
Sensory bias as an explanation for the evolution of mate preferences.感官偏好作为配偶偏好进化的一种解释。
Am Nat. 2005 Oct;166(4):437-46. doi: 10.1086/444443. Epub 2005 Aug 5.
7
The evolution of mate choice and mating biases.配偶选择与交配偏好的演变。
Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Mar 22;270(1515):653-64. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2235.
8
Overt female mate competition and preference for central males in a lekking antelope.一种求偶场羚羊中明显的雌性配偶竞争及对优势雄性的偏好
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Jul 9;99(14):9290-3. doi: 10.1073/pnas.142125899. Epub 2002 Jun 27.
9
Costs of sexual traits: a mismatch between theoretical considerations and empirical evidence.性特征的成本:理论考量与实证证据之间的不匹配。
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2001 Aug;76(3):365-76. doi: 10.1017/s1464793101005711.
10
Sexually selected traits and adult survival: a meta-analysis.性选择特征与成年个体存活率:一项荟萃分析
Q Rev Biol. 2001 Mar;76(1):3-36. doi: 10.1086/393743.