Stevenson Scott A, Elsley James K, Corneil Brian D
Canadian Institute of Health Research Group in Action and Perception, Graduate Program in Neuroscience, Department of Physiology, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario N6A 5K8, Canada.
J Neurophysiol. 2009 Feb;101(2):580-90. doi: 10.1152/jn.90891.2008. Epub 2008 Nov 19.
The "gap effect" describes a phenomenon whereby saccadic reaction times are expedited by the removal of a visible fixation point prior to target presentation. Here we investigated whether processes controlling saccade cancellation are also subjected to a gap effect. Human subjects performed a countermanding experiment that required them to try to cancel an impending saccade in the presence of an imperative visual stop signal, across different fixation conditions. We found that saccadic cancellation latencies, estimated via derivation of the stop signal reaction time (SSRT), were approximately 40 ms shorter on trials with a 200-ms gap between fixation point removal and target presentation compared with when the fixation point remained illuminated. Follow-up experiments confirmed that the reduction in SSRTs were primarily due to removal of a foveal fixation point (as opposed to a generalized warning effect) and persisted with an auditory stop signal that controlled for potential differences in stop signal saliency across different fixation conditions. Saccadic RTs exhibited a gap effect in all experiments with reductions in RTs being due to both removal of a foveal fixation point and a generalized warning effect. Overall, our results demonstrate that processes controlling saccade cancellation can be expedited by a 200-ms gap. The simultaneous priming of both saccade cancellation and generation is of particular interest considering the mutually antagonistic relationship between the saccade fixation and generation networks in the oculomotor system.
“间隙效应”描述了一种现象,即在目标呈现之前去除可见的注视点会加快扫视反应时间。在此,我们研究了控制扫视取消的过程是否也会受到间隙效应的影响。人类受试者进行了一项反指令实验,要求他们在不同的注视条件下,在出现强制性视觉停止信号时尝试取消即将发生的扫视。我们发现,通过推导停止信号反应时间(SSRT)来估计,与注视点保持亮着的情况相比,在注视点移除和目标呈现之间有200毫秒间隙的试验中,扫视取消潜伏期大约短40毫秒。后续实验证实,SSRT的缩短主要是由于中央凹注视点的移除(而非普遍的警告效应),并且在控制了不同注视条件下停止信号显著性潜在差异的听觉停止信号实验中依然存在。在所有实验中,扫视反应时均表现出间隙效应,反应时的缩短是由于中央凹注视点的移除和普遍的警告效应共同作用。总体而言,我们的结果表明,控制扫视取消的过程可通过200毫秒的间隙而加快。考虑到动眼系统中扫视注视和产生网络之间的相互拮抗关系,扫视取消和产生的同时启动尤其令人感兴趣。