• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[受体移植前MELD-AS评分及移植物大小对成人对成人活体肝移植结局的影响]

[Influence of recipient pretransplant MELD-AS score and graft size on the outcome of adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation].

作者信息

Feng Xi, Wei Yong-gang, Li Fu-qiang, Yuan Ding, Jiang Hua, Du Zheng-gui, Yin Jie, Li Bo

机构信息

Center of Liver Transplantation, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.

出版信息

Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2008 Sep;39(5):801-4.

PMID:19024318
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the relationship between the pretransplant condition of recipient, graft size and the outcomes of recipient after adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation.

METHODS

From January 2002 to January 2007, 70 patients underwent adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation (ALDLT) in West China Hospital. There were 67 patients received right lobe graft without middle hepatic vein (MHV) and 3 patients received dual grafts. The patients were followed up until January 2008. The recipients were stratified according to pretransplant MELD-AS score and graft size. The outcomes of these patients were analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

Recipient 1-year survival rate and complication rate were 87.1% and 34.3%, respectively. For the patients with MELD-AS score from 1 to 13, the survival rates of large graft and small graft were 100.0% and 83.3%, the complication rates were 14.3% and 16.7%; for those MELD-AS score between 14-24, the survival rates of large graft and small graft were 94.4% and 75.0%, the complication rates were 38.9% and 50.0%; for those MELD-AS scores were 25 or higher, the survival rates of large graft and small graft were 77.8% and 25.0%, the complication rates were 52.9% and 50.0%. Statistical significant difference of survival between large graft group and small graft group was found among the recipients with MELD-AS score > or =25.

CONCLUSION

The recipient survival is influenced simutanously by pretransplant MELD-AS score of recipient and graft size influence. Further more, large graft improve the survival in recipients whose MELD-AS score were 25 or higher.

摘要

目的

探讨成人活体肝移植受体移植前状况、移植肝大小与受体预后的关系。

方法

2002年1月至2007年1月,70例患者在华西医院接受成人活体肝移植(ALDLT)。其中67例接受无肝中静脉(MHV)的右叶移植肝,3例接受双叶移植肝。对患者随访至2008年1月。根据移植前MELD-AS评分和移植肝大小对受体进行分层。对这些患者的预后进行回顾性分析。

结果

受体1年生存率和并发症发生率分别为87.1%和34.3%。MELD-AS评分为1至13分的患者,大体积移植肝和小体积移植肝的生存率分别为100.0%和83.3%,并发症发生率分别为14.3%和16.7%;MELD-AS评分为14至24分的患者,大体积移植肝和小体积移植肝的生存率分别为94.4%和75.0%,并发症发生率分别为38.9%和50.0%;MELD-AS评分25分及以上的患者,大体积移植肝和小体积移植肝的生存率分别为77.8%和25.0%,并发症发生率分别为52.9%和50.0%。在MELD-AS评分≥25分的受体中,大体积移植肝组和小体积移植肝组的生存率差异有统计学意义。

结论

受体的生存同时受到移植前MELD-AS评分和移植肝大小的影响。此外,大体积移植肝可提高MELD-AS评分25分及以上受体的生存率。

相似文献

1
[Influence of recipient pretransplant MELD-AS score and graft size on the outcome of adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation].[受体移植前MELD-AS评分及移植物大小对成人对成人活体肝移植结局的影响]
Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2008 Sep;39(5):801-4.
2
Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score does not predict patient or graft survival in living donor liver transplant recipients.终末期肝病模型评分不能预测活体肝移植受者的患者或移植物存活率。
Liver Transpl. 2003 Jul;9(7):737-40. doi: 10.1053/jlts.2003.50122.
3
Improved outcome of adult recipients with a high model for end-stage liver disease score and a small-for-size graft.终末期肝病模型评分高且移植物过小的成年受者的预后改善。
Liver Transpl. 2009 May;15(5):496-503. doi: 10.1002/lt.21606.
4
Live donor liver transplantation in high MELD score recipients.高 MELD 评分受者的活体供肝肝移植。
Ann Surg. 2010 Jan;251(1):153-7. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181bc9c6a.
5
Impact of pretransplant MELD score on posttransplant outcome in living donor liver transplantation.移植前终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分对活体肝移植术后结局的影响。
Transplant Proc. 2004 Jun;36(5):1442-4. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2004.05.004.
6
Impact of donor age and recipient status on left-lobe graft for living donor adult liver transplantation.供体年龄和受体状态对活体供肝成人肝移植左叶移植物的影响。
Transpl Int. 2008 Jan;21(1):81-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-2277.2007.00561.x. Epub 2007 Sep 20.
7
MELD and prediction of post-liver transplantation survival.终末期肝病模型(MELD)与肝移植术后生存预测
Liver Transpl. 2006 Mar;12(3):440-7. doi: 10.1002/lt.20721.
8
Utilization of extended donor criteria liver allograft: Is the elevated risk of failure independent of the model for end-stage liver disease score of the recipient?扩大标准供体肝移植的应用:移植失败风险升高是否独立于受者的终末期肝病模型评分?
Transplantation. 2006 Dec 27;82(12):1653-7. doi: 10.1097/01.tp.0000250571.41361.21.
9
Critical graft size in adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation: impact of the recipient's disease.成人-to-成人活体肝移植中的关键移植肝大小:受者疾病的影响
Liver Transpl. 2001 Nov;7(11):948-53. doi: 10.1053/jlts.2001.29033.
10
Predicting outcome after liver transplantation: utility of the model for end-stage liver disease and a newly derived discrimination function.预测肝移植后的结局:终末期肝病模型及新推导的判别函数的效用。
Transplantation. 2004 Jan 15;77(1):99-106. doi: 10.1097/01.TP.0000101009.91516.FC.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of five models for end-stage liver disease in predicting the survival rate of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.终末期肝病的五种模型对晚期肝细胞癌患者生存率预测的比较。
Tumour Biol. 2016 Apr;37(4):5265-73. doi: 10.1007/s13277-015-4366-2. Epub 2015 Nov 11.