Cobankara Funda Kont, Orucoglu Hasan, Ozkan Hatice Buyukozer, Yildirim Cihan
Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Endodontics, Selçuk University, Konya, Turkey.
J Endod. 2008 Dec;34(12):1504-7. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2008.08.030. Epub 2008 Oct 11.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of immediate and delayed post space preparation on the apical sealing ability of EndoREZ, a methacrylate-based dual-cured resin sealer, with or without accelerator. Fifty extracted human teeth were endodontically prepared and randomly divided into 6 groups. Teeth in experimental groups 1, 2, 3, and 4 (n = 10) were filled with resin-coated gutta-percha and either EndoREZ with accelerator (A+) or EndoREZ without accelerator (A-) by the lateral compaction technique. In group1 (A+) and group2 (A-), the post space was prepared immediately at the time of obturation. In groups 3 (A+) and 4 (A-), the post space was prepared after storage in 100% humidity at 37 degrees C for 1 week. Groups 5 and 6 (n = 5) represented positive and negative control groups, respectively. Leakage was determined by computerized fluid filtration device. Complete leakage was observed in group 5, and no leakage was evident in group 6 (P = 1.000). In experimental groups, mean apical microleakage values (microL/cmH(2)O/min(-1)) were as follows: group 1, 2.77 +/- 0.79(a); group 2, 2.88 +/- 1.38(a); group 3, 19.95 +/- 7.85(c); group 4, 6.20 +/- 2.09(b) (different letters indicate significantly different groups, P < .005). Immediate post space preparation achieved better sealing than delayed post preparation at the apical end, regardless of whether the EndoREZ accelerator was used. There was no significant difference between the (A+) and (A-) in immediate post space preparation. However, more leakage was found when using (A+) than (A-) in delayed post preparation. Under the conditions of this study, it was concluded that EndoREZ accelerator seems not to provide clinicians with any advantage for rapid transition from endodontic treatment to post-endodontic restorative procedures immediately after completion of root canal therapy.
本研究的目的是评估即刻和延迟进行桩道预备对一种基于甲基丙烯酸酯的双固化树脂封闭剂EndoREZ(添加或不添加促进剂)根尖封闭能力的影响。选取50颗拔除的人牙进行根管预备,并随机分为6组。实验组1、2、3和4(每组n = 10)中的牙齿采用侧向加压技术,用树脂涂层牙胶尖和添加促进剂的EndoREZ(A +)或不添加促进剂的EndoREZ(A -)进行充填。在第1组(A +)和第2组(A -)中,在充填时即刻预备桩道。在第3组(A +)和第4组(A -)中,在37℃、100%湿度下储存1周后预备桩道。第5组和第6组(每组n = 5)分别为阳性和阴性对照组。通过计算机化流体过滤装置测定微渗漏情况。第5组观察到完全渗漏,第6组无明显渗漏(P = 1.000)。在实验组中,根尖微渗漏的平均数值(微升/厘米水柱/分钟)如下:第1组,2.77±0.79(a);第2组,2.88±1.38(a);第3组,19.95±7.85(c);第4组,6.20±2.09(b)(不同字母表示差异有统计学意义的组,P <.005)。无论是否使用EndoREZ促进剂,即刻进行桩道预备在根尖处的封闭效果均优于延迟预备。即刻预备桩道时,(A +)组和(A -)组之间无显著差异。然而,延迟预备时使用(A +)组比(A -)组发现更多渗漏。在本研究条件下,得出结论:EndoREZ促进剂似乎并未为临床医生在根管治疗完成后立即从牙髓治疗快速过渡到牙髓治疗后修复程序提供任何优势。