Salles Gil F, Cardoso Claudia R L, Muxfeldt Elizabeth S
Rua Croton, 72, Jacarepagua, Rio de Janeiro - RJ, Brasil, CEP: 22750-240.
Arch Intern Med. 2008 Nov 24;168(21):2340-6. doi: 10.1001/archinte.168.21.2340.
The prognostic value of office and ambulatory blood pressures (BPs) in patients with resistant hypertension is uncertain.
This prospective study investigates the importance of office and ambulatory BPs as predictors of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. At baseline, 556 resistant hypertensive patients underwent clinical-laboratory and 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring examinations. Primary end points were a composite of fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular events and all-cause and cardiovascular mortalities. Multiple Cox regression was used to assess associations between BP and subsequent end points.
After median follow-up of 4.8 years, 109 patients (19.6%) reached the primary end point, and 70 all-cause deaths (12.6%) occurred (46 had cardiovascular causes). After adjustment for age, sex, body mass index, diabetes mellitus, smoking, physical inactivity, dyslipidemia, previous cardiovascular diseases, serum creatinine level, and number of antihypertensive drugs in use, no office BP showed any prognostic value. After further adjustment for office BP, higher mean ambulatory BPs were independent predictors of the composite end point. The hazard ratios associated with a 1-SD increment in daytime and nighttime systolic BP were 1.26 (95% confidence interval, 1.04-1.53) and 1.38 (1.13-1.68), respectively; the corresponding values for diastolic BP were 1.31 (1.05-1.63) and 1.36 (1.10-1.69). Ambulatory systolic and diastolic BP were equivalent predictors, and both were better than pulse pressure; nighttime BP was superior to daytime BP. For all-cause mortality, only the ambulatory BP monitoring diagnosis of true resistant hypertension was an independent predictor.
Higher ambulatory BP predicts cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in resistant hypertensive patients, whereas office BP has no prognostic value.
诊室血压和动态血压对顽固性高血压患者的预后价值尚不确定。
这项前瞻性研究调查了诊室血压和动态血压作为心血管疾病发病率和死亡率预测指标的重要性。基线时,556例顽固性高血压患者接受了临床实验室检查和24小时动态血压监测。主要终点为致命和非致命心血管事件以及全因死亡率和心血管死亡率的综合指标。采用多重Cox回归分析评估血压与后续终点之间的关联。
中位随访4.8年后,109例患者(19.6%)达到主要终点,70例患者(12.6%)发生全因死亡(46例由心血管疾病引起)。在对年龄、性别、体重指数、糖尿病、吸烟、缺乏运动、血脂异常、既往心血管疾病、血清肌酐水平和使用的抗高血压药物数量进行调整后,诊室血压未显示出任何预后价值。在进一步调整诊室血压后,较高的平均动态血压是综合终点的独立预测指标。白天和夜间收缩压每增加1个标准差的风险比分别为1.26(95%置信区间为1.04 - 1.53)和1.38(1.13 - 1.68);舒张压的相应值分别为1.31(1.05 - 1.63)和1.36(1.10 - 1.69)。动态收缩压和舒张压是等效的预测指标,且均优于脉压;夜间血压优于白天血压。对于全因死亡率,只有动态血压监测诊断的真正顽固性高血压是独立预测指标。
较高的动态血压可预测顽固性高血压患者的心血管疾病发病率和死亡率,而诊室血压没有预后价值。