White Jeremy B, Barraja Mathieu, Mengesha Tewodros, Bose Sumit, Ashktorab Samaneh, Bahn Ryan, Vallance Ryan, Lindsey William H
Division of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, The George Washington University, Washington DC 20037, USA.
Laryngoscope. 2008 Dec;118(12):2107-10. doi: 10.1097/MLG.0b013e3181856067.
Manipulation and suspension of the superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS) is performed by 74% of rhytidectomy surgeons. Multiple variations in suture techniques are employed in this task, but they have never been evaluated for differences in their ability to withstand stress.
To compare the biomechanical properties of two different suture techniques that are used in SMAS plications during rhytidectomy: a double-layered running locking (DRL) stitch and multiple horizontal mattress stitches.
Fourteen horizontal mattress plications, in rows of six sutures, and comparable lengths of 16 DRL stitch plications of pig skin samples, were stressed using a tensometer with grip displacement increasing at a constant rate of 0.5 cm/Min. The required force to cause plication failure was recorded for each sample at three suture break points.
There was no significant difference between the two groups in the force required to cause the initial suture failure. Unlike the horizontal mattress plication, an initial break seemed to cause minimal to no distortion of the DRL tissue plication. When results were normalized by the initial break forces to account for small variations in tissue properties, the force ratio required to cause a second suture break was significantly larger in the DRL group than in the horizontal mattress technique. This is evidenced by the average second to first break force ratios of 1.62 vs. 1.13 for the DRL and horizontal mattress stitches, respectively, with a P-value of .60. The mean ratios of third to first break forces for the DRL and horizontal mattress groups were 2.08 and 0.91, respectively, with a P-value of .08.
The DRL stitch requires more force than the horizontal mattress stitch to cause significant failure of tissue plication. This technique may enable plastic surgeons to avoid early revision rhytidectomy due to suture failure, and to create a long-lasting, youthful cosmetic result.
74%的除皱手术医生会对表浅肌肉腱膜系统(SMAS)进行操作和悬吊。在这项操作中使用了多种缝合技术的变体,但从未对它们承受压力的能力差异进行过评估。
比较除皱手术中用于SMAS折叠的两种不同缝合技术的生物力学特性:双层连续锁边(DRL)缝合法和多根水平褥式缝合法。
对猪皮样本进行14排水平褥式折叠,每排6针缝线,以及16段长度相当的DRL缝合法折叠,使用拉力计以0.5厘米/分钟的恒定速率增加夹具位移对其施加压力。在三个缝线断裂点记录每个样本导致折叠失败所需的力。
两组导致初始缝线失败所需的力没有显著差异。与水平褥式折叠不同,DRL组织折叠的初始断裂似乎对其造成的变形极小或没有变形。当通过初始断裂力对结果进行归一化以考虑组织特性的微小差异时,DRL组导致第二次缝线断裂所需的力比显著高于水平褥式技术组。DRL缝合法和水平褥式缝合法的平均第二次与第一次断裂力比分别为1.62和1.13,P值为0.60,这证明了这一点。DRL组和水平褥式组第三次与第一次断裂力的平均比值分别为2.08和0.91,P值为0.08。
DRL缝合法比水平褥式缝合法需要更大的力才能导致组织折叠显著失败。这种技术可能使整形外科医生避免因缝线失败而进行早期除皱手术修复,并创造出持久、年轻化的美容效果。