Perez C A, Pajak T, Emami B, Hornback N B, Tupchong L, Rubin P
Radiation Oncology Center, St. Louis MO 63108.
Am J Clin Oncol. 1991 Apr;14(2):133-41. doi: 10.1097/00000421-199104000-00008.
A total of 307 patients with superficial measurable tumors were registered on a Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) protocol involving fractionated radiation therapy, either alone or followed immediately by hyperthermia (42.5 degrees C, 45-60 min). Overall complete response (CR) was observed in 30% of the lesions treated with radiotherapy (RT) and 32% of those receiving RT and heat. Response was found to be significantly related to both maximum tumor diameter (less than 3 or greater than or equal to 3 cm) and site/histology (breast/adenocarcinoma, head and neck/squamous, or other site/histologies). In tumors less than 3 cm in diameter in the breast, trunk, and extremities, a better CR rate was noted with irradiation and heat (62 and 67%) than with irradiation alone (40 and 0%). However, in the head and neck there was only minimal difference in CR with irradiation alone or combined with hyperthermia (50 vs 38%). In lesions less than 3 cm treated with irradiation and heat, there was improved local control. In lesions greater than 3 cm, there was no difference in local control between the two treatment arms. The higher response rate in patients with smaller lesions (less than 3 cm) may be explained by the fact that these tumors are easier to heat. Problems in correlating tumor response with quality of heating include less than optimal heating in larger lesions and the limited ability of current thermometry to map the temperature distribution in a tumor. Acute and late toxicities in both treatment arms were comparable, except for an overall 30% incidence of thermal blisters in the heated tumors.
共有307例浅表可测量肿瘤患者登记参加了放射治疗肿瘤学组(RTOG)的一项方案,该方案涉及分次放射治疗,单独使用或紧接着进行热疗(42.5摄氏度,45 - 60分钟)。接受放射治疗(RT)的病灶中,总体完全缓解(CR)率为30%;接受RT加温热疗的病灶中,总体完全缓解率为32%。发现缓解与最大肿瘤直径(小于3厘米或大于或等于3厘米)以及部位/组织学类型(乳腺/腺癌、头颈部/鳞状细胞癌或其他部位/组织学类型)均显著相关。在乳腺、躯干和四肢直径小于3厘米的肿瘤中,照射加温热疗的CR率(分别为62%和67%)高于单纯照射(分别为40%和0%)。然而,在头颈部,单纯照射或联合热疗的CR率差异极小(分别为50%和38%)。对于小于3厘米的病灶,照射加温热疗可改善局部控制。对于大于3厘米的病灶,两种治疗组的局部控制无差异。较小病灶(小于3厘米)患者的缓解率较高,可能是因为这些肿瘤更容易加热。将肿瘤反应与加热质量相关联存在一些问题,包括较大病灶加热不理想以及当前测温法绘制肿瘤温度分布的能力有限。两个治疗组的急性和晚期毒性相当,但加热肿瘤中热水疱的总体发生率为30%。